Pinned Tweet
Dear medical community,
#Evolution matters. Let me tell you why.
WHEN I COME BACK I'M GOING TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHY PEOPLE DON'T LIKE BEING MADE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THEY'RE CLOSELY RELATED TO CHIMPANZEES AND THAT MUCH OF THEIR BEHAVIOR IS FOUND AMONG CHIMPANZEES! I'M NOT BACK, YET, BUT I'LL TELL YOU ANYWAY! IT'S BECAUSE IT MAKES THEM REALIZE THAT THEY'RE NO DIFFERENT THAN OTHER ANIMALS, PARTICULARLY OTHER PRIMATES! IT MAKES THEM REALIZE THAT THEIR THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIOR ARE DRIVEN BY THE SAME MOTIVES IN LIFE (SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTION) THAT MOTIVATE OTHER ANIMALS, PARTICULARLY OTHER PRIMATES! AND IT MAKES THEM REALIZE THAT THEIR LIFE AND ESPECIALLY THEIR DEATH ARE INSIGNIFICANT. YOU EITHER PASS ON YOUR GENES OR YOU DON'T JUST LIKE ALL OTHER ANIMALS AND THAT'S THE END OF IT. THERE'S NO AFTERLIFE FOR HUMANS JUST AS THERE'S NO AFTERLIFE FOR ANY OTHER ANIMAL!
We (Humans) Share Over 98% Of Our DNA (Genes) With Our Genetically Closest Hominid Cousin, The Chimpanzee, Since We're Both Descended From The Same Hominid Ancestor Who Lived About 6-7 Million Years Ago (An Ancestor That Lived Around The Time Of Sahelanthropus tchadensis's Existence). So It's Only Natural (Since We Possess So Many Of The Same Genes In Common) That We Would Share Many Of The Same Physical Traits, Psychological Traits, Behavioral Traits, Etc. With Our Chimpanzee Cousin. In Fact, Some Of Our More Complex Human Psychology, Behavior, And Culture (Self-Awareness, Consciousness (Theory Of Mind), Morality, Altruism, Deceptiveness, Hierarchical Society, Religion, Etc.) Are Found In Their Rudimentary Form Among Our Chimpanzee Cousin (Chimpanzees Can Often Be Seen Engaging In The Vestigial Forms Of Our More Sophisticated Human Thought And Behavior As Demonstrated In The Photos Below).
I'm Talking To Tha Mandingo In The Mirror!
"I'm A Tree Top Nigga! I'm A Tree Top Nigga!" - Y.G. Foe Hunted
"TREE GANG!" - DJ Q U I K
"I COULD BE PART OF YOUR FAMILY TREE!" - RUBIX CUBE
"...the genetic connection between humans and chimpanzees is closer than between dolphins and salmon..." - Paul Bloom
On hearing, one June afternoon in 1860, the suggestion that mankind was descended from the apes, the wife of the Bishop of Worcester is said to have exclaimed, ‘My dear, descended from the apes! Let us hope it is not true, but if it is, let us pray that it will not become generally known.’ As it turns out, she need not have been quite so worried: we are not descended from the apes, though we do share a common ancestor with them. Even though the distinction may have been too subtle to offer her much comfort, it is nevertheless important.
"Monkey Shit Is Not Alloooooowed! So Getcho Monkey Ass From Aroooooound Me!" - Ralo Da Piiiiiimp
"Monkey Shit Is Not Alloooooowed! So Getcho Monkey Ass From Aroooooound Me!" - Ralo Da Piiiiiimp
MAYBE I'M WRONG ABOUT CHIMPANZEES AND HUMANS SHARING SIMILAR BEHAVIORAL TRAITS AND EMOTIONS BECAUSE OF THEIR SIMILAR ANCESTRY. IT MAY BE BECAUSE WE EVOLVED IN SIMILAR SOCIAL SETTINGS. READ HERE:
Did I learn something from the book? Well, there are anecdotes about chimp compassion and altruism that are new to me, but I had already accepted the proposition that humans evolved an innate set of moral “rules” and emotions based on our millions of years of living in small groups of hunter-gatherers. It’s not at all hard to believe that natural selection would mold not just behaviors, but emotions (which of course underlie many such behaviors) that would impel us to take care of others, and to be better to those who behave better, while punishing “free-riders” and miscreants. And it’s not news to me that other primate groups have “proto-morality,” though it might be to others who haven’t read de Waal’s other books.
I disagree, though, that the behaviors and genes that make chimps and humans compassionate to “in-group” members are homologous–that they are genes inherited from our common ancestors. As I learned at a recent meeting in Oakland University, primate “morality” does not map neatly onto primate phylogeny. Orangutans, for instance, don’t show the sense of equity demonstrated by capuchin monkeys, even though orangs are more closely related to us than are capuchins.
It seems likely, at least to me, that natural selection independently molds behaviors based on how a species lives: orangs are solitary, capuchins gregarious. And other species, distant from us, show behaviors that look altruistic (whales, dolphins, dogs, and so on). So if we’re innately solicitous to members of our in-group, as I think we are, this may have evolved in our own lineage after we separated from the chimp lineage, and chimp and human behaviors are convergent, not homologous. This is supported by the very different forms of altruism and caring shown by bonobos vs. chimps, who diverged only about 1-2 million years ago, versus the 5-6 million years ago that our lineage diverged from that of both species of chimps. Social behavior is evolutionarily malleable. We may be able to learn about the evolution of altruism and cooperation in chimps by studying them, but not necessarily learn much about the evolutionary basis of morality in our own species. Remember that we did not descend from modern chimps or bonobos, but from common ancestors whose social system may have differed from all of ours.
Photos Taken From The Following Books:
Evolution: The Human Story
The Complete World Of Human Evolution
 |
| Do You Mind If I Hang From Your Chandeliers? |
AT EASE OFFICER!
UH TENNNNNN SHUN!
You know them. You've seen them, perhaps in zoos, perhaps in the movies or on television. You've looked deep into their dark, soulful eyes, pondered their hairy faces, and recognized a mind behind those eyes. A mind like a child's perhaps, but a mind akin to your own. You've seen their sinewy arms, their long fingers clasping something - a twig to use as a tool? Or perhaps a Raggedy-Ann doll?
And you know about those resemblances. That chimpanzees, says the narrator, is more than 98% genetically identical to us. That similarity he says, blunts the line between us. We are chimpanzees, and they are us.
But take another look. Those deep eyes - without whites, which those chimpanzee eyes really do lack - they look more like a dog's dark eyes than like your own, don't they? And those sinewy arms are rather hairy, aren't they? They aren't human arms at all - they are like human arms. The chimpanzees themselves could not really be confused with people. Their heads are smaller. Their eyeteeth are bigger. They have neither noses nor foreheads to speak of. Their legs are short, their ears are huge, and they use their hands in walking. They have thumbs on their feet. They have knees pointing ridiculously far outward.
Listen to them. You hear no speech; rather, a series of grunts and hoots. Sounds, meaningful sounds, but hardly human sounds.
They don't gossip, pray, sing, praise, or insult. They don't decorate their bodies or cover them up. Their sexuality is stimulated by colorful swelling of the female genitalia. In fact, the chimpanzees do hardly anything you might recognize as being human. When they do, after all, it's newsworthy.
And not only that, but sometimes, the adults kill and eat the chimpanzee babies.
All of which is certainly not to deny that chimpanzees are closely related to us. In the panoply of nature, chimpanzees are very similar to us. Our species give birth to live young and nurses them, like chimpanzees and other mammals and unlike salamanders and pigeons. Among the mammals, our species has grasping hands, toenails, and only one pair of nipples - a combination again like chimpanzees, but unlike cows or dogs or dolphins. And among the primates, our species has a very mobile shoulder and no tail - once again like chimpanzees, but unlike the awfully cute lorises and vervet monkeys of Africa.
The great apes ae indeed physically similar to us, and they indeed are our closest living relatives. Particularly the African great apes: the familiar common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), found across Central and West Africa; the bonobo (Pan paniscus), a very similar and rare species with a distinctive black face and a head with long hair parted in the center; and the large gorilla (Gorilla gorilla), rare in the Viruga mountains but more common in the lowlands of West Africa. None is plentiful in nature; all are restricted to patchy and often discontinuous ranges of land in a quite restricted part of the world. Their cousin, Homo sapiens, is by contrasting exceedingly plentiful. Too plentiful, many would argue.
We are slightly more distantly related to the red-haired orangutan of Borneo and Sumatra. Like the chimpanzees and gorillas, the Asian orangutan is also a "great ape," in contrast to the small , long-armed and exceedingly graceful gibbons of southeast Asia, the "lesser apes." We're still similar enough to the orangutans, though, that the very name "orangutan" means "man of the woods" in Malay. The indigenous peoples didn't need science to tell them of that creature's general similarities to them.
The general estimate, which there is no good reason to doubt at present, is that about seven million years ago Homo, Pan, and Gorilla all comprised a single species. That species lived in Africa (which is, after all, where its descendants live), and probably resembled the chimpanzee. One group evolved a larger body size and ultimately became gorillas, and another group began to walk upright and ultimately became humans. And it is certainly possible that there were several other branches of that family tree that flourished, say, three million years ago, but whose remains have not yet been unearthed.
Obviously, a lot can happen in seven million years - a creature resembling a chimpanzee can evolve into a creature resembling a human being, for example. But it is also paradoxically little more than a flash in biological time. It all depends upon one's perspective. The average species of clam, for example, remains largely unchanged for as much a ten million years.
Fifteen million years ago, there were many diverse species of apes, thriving in the pristine and abundant woodlands of Africa, Asia, and Europe. The Miocene epoch, which lasted from about twenty-five to five million years ago, encompasses the florescence of the apes. They ranged in size from the diminutive Micropithecus to the aptly named Gigantopithecus, whose jaw dwarfs that of a modern gorilla. All looked diagnosably different from modern apes, but all would be recognized as apes; non would be readily mistaken for a raccoon or a billy goat.
Modern apes thus constitute in the present day but a miniscule relic of the ecological space once occupied buy their mighty group. And this shift from diverse and prolific to nearly extinct, from masters of the primate world to is tattered and pathetic remnants, has occurred with an evolutionary filament of the billions of years of life on earth, the single thread that subsumes the emergence and development of the human line from that ape radiation.
Seven million years ago, toward the end of the Miocene, the ancestors of living humans, gorillas and chimps wet their separate evolutionary ways. Possibly the proto-chimpanzees were spread widely over Central Africa, the proto-gorillas occupied West Africa, where we find modern gorillas, and the proto-humans occupied East Africa, where we find the earliest humanlike fossils.
The human fossils are more more copious than late ape fossils because, like modern apes, the ancestral apes lived generally in forested areas whose soil doesn't preserve fossils well. The human hallmark, bipedalism, took our ancestor to open savannas, where the complex geological processes of fossilization could more readily occur. The resulting abundance of proto-human fossils and near absence of later ape (chimp/gorilla) fossils makes it unlikely that the fossil record will tell us much about the actual historical divergence of humans and living apes from one another.
What It Means To Be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People and Their Genes. Marks, p. 8-10. (THIS IS ONE OF THE WORST BOOKS ON THE EVOLUTION OF HUMANS THAT I'VE EVER READ. THE AUTHOR IS OBVIOUSLY A DISCIPLE OF THE Stephen Jay Gould & Richard Lewontin SCHOOL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION AND GENETICS AND, THUS, A RACE DENIER. FURTHERMORE, THE TITLE OF THIS BOOK IS MISLEADING. YOU'D THINK IT'D HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY AND GENETIC HISTORY OF HUMANS AND THEIR RELATION TO CHIMPANZEES AND OTHER HOMINIDS, BUT IT REALLY DOESN'T. IT'S MOSTLY A HISTORY OF THE ACADEMIC STUDY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION AND HUMAN GENETICS (THE WHO'S WHO AND THE WHAT'S WHAT OF HUMAN GENETICS AND EVOLUTIONARY STUDIES). (DON'T BUY THIS BOOK OR EVEN READ THIS BOOK. THE PASSAGE THAT I JUST COPIED IS THE BEST THING IN IT AND SOME OF IT IS INCORRECT (THE PART ABOUT ORANGUTANS BEING MORE DISTANTLY RELATED TO HUMANS).)
"MADD GORILLAS AND ORANGUTANS" - T NUTTZ
"A SAVAGE GO RILLA" - Parkside Piru (Cillie Cider)
"CAIN'T HANG WIT US GORILLAS MANE YOU JUST AN ORANGUTAN" - Sum Dum Nigger Whose Name I Don't Have Time Searching Fore!
The Fore!
Climb That Socioeconomic Ladder!
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/wild/how-human-are-you/video-gallery/?filter=clips
EVERYBODY'S A WINNER!
Photos Taken From The Following Books:
Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are
The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates
The Ape And The Sushi Master Reflections Of A Primatologist
⧬
The Negroid's Default Language Is Chimp (Eww Eww Ahh Ahh Eww Eww Ahh Ahh Eww Eww Eww Eww Ahh Ahh Ahh Ahh
). If The Negroid Is Not Taught A Human Language At Birth It Will
Revert To This Primal Form Of Communication. The Negroid Is Genetically
Hardwired To Do So (To Speak Chimp), Since The Chimp Is Its Next Closest
Relative. The Negroid Toddler Above Is Only Doing What Comes Naturally
To It Which Is Speak Chimp. (I'm Referring To Teen Mom's Daughter http://instagram.com/d0llywood I Believe Teen Mom Removed The Video Above, But You Can Still Detect Chimp Like Vocalizations And Vernacular In The Other Videos That Feature Her Daughter.)
Pay Close Attention To The Gorilla Like Dominance Display. Notice How Naturally And Instinctively It Comes To The Negroid? (Do You Also Notice How The Negroid Female Is Attracted To This Display?) This Innate Behavior Is Further Evidence Of The Close Genetic Relationship The Negroid Has With His Hominin Cousins (The Chimpanzee, The Bonobo, The Gorilla, Etc). The Negroid Is One Step And One Call Away From His More Primitive, Jungle Living Cousins. (Niggers Have Superhuman Strength. No Other Human SubSpecies (Race) Has The Muscular Strength Of The Negroid. You Have To Look Outside Of The Human Species To Find Any Approximate Equivalent. And When You Look Outside You Find Their Closest Equivalent In The Chimpanzee. And, Sure Enough, When You Look At The Genes Of The Chimpanzee That Control Muscular Development You Find These Same Genes And Similar Variants Among The Negroid (The Nigger). If That Isn't A Smoking Gun I Don't Know What Is.)
A MISSIONARY
1:05 Mr. Mane Meant Chimpanzee Nuts Not Monkey Nuts ("Cuz They Knew I Had Them 20s And Chimpanzee Nuttz!"). Chimpanzee Testicles, Relative To Body Size, Are The Largest Found Among Primates. Why Are They Larger Than Monkeys? Because Chimpanzee Females Are More Promiscuous, So To Compete For Reproductive Success, Chimpanzee Males Had To Evolve Large Testicles That Could Create, Store, And Propel Huge Amounts Of Sperm Into Females (Chimpanzee Males Needed To Evolve Huge Testicles So They That Could Ejaculate Huge Amounts Of Sperm To Block Their Competitor's Sperm And Have A Better Chance Of Impregnating A Female, Hence Their Huge Testicles! This Was The Selection Pressure Placed On Them By Their Promiscuous Female Chimpanzee Counterparts!).
"THEY TRYNA TEST YO TESTICLEZ!" - SUGA
http://instagram.com/p/kj6kE3RDCR/
BIG BALLZ (MUCHO COJONEZ)
https://thehumanevolutionblog.com/2017/02/27/the-body-language-of-bonobos-and-the-evolution-of-human-language/
"THEY TRYNA TEST YO TESTICLEZ!" - SUGA
"Imma Let Mines Hang...My Nuttz Need Room...My Nuttz Gotta Breath!" - Ike Dola The Hoe Controlla
"Filled Up Wit Embalming Fluid So I Still Got Hard Nuttz" - Alpha Beta Bossalini
"Filled Up Wit Embalming Fluid So I Still Got Hard Nuttz" - Alpha Beta Bossalini
"If I Die Bury Me, Hang My Ballz On A Tree On F I G...If They Fall Take A Bite, I Bet You They Taste Like UH Hundred And 9th!" - B-Braze A Dazy!
"I Charge A Hoe Like Ladanian! Got BIG Nuttz Like Macadamian!" - W H YB "The Paper Boy"! (N/0)
"Ax Y They Hate Cuz They Got The Nutts The Size Of Grapes!" - Grape Fruit South Street Park Mexican!
"Bitchez On The Tracc Cuz I Got BIG Fuckin' Nuttz!" - Ralo Da Piiiiiimp!
"I Charge A Hoe Like Ladanian! Got BIG Nuttz Like Macadamian!" - W H YB "The Paper Boy"! (N/0)
"Ax Y They Hate Cuz They Got The Nutts The Size Of Grapes!" - Grape Fruit South Street Park Mexican!
"Bitchez On The Tracc Cuz I Got BIG Fuckin' Nuttz!" - Ralo Da Piiiiiimp!
"Cuz I Got BIG Nuttz...Yeah, I Got BIG Nuttz Ya Girl She Tryna Lyft 'Em Up!" - ConRad From The Ave
https://x.com/robkhenderson/status/1838602260084908325
"They Say 'Spider Where You Get Ya Gall?' And I Respond 'I Was Born Wit 2 BIG Ol' Ballz!'" - Spider (Monkey) Loc
"No Nuttz, No Glory!" - Nigga Doggy Dogg
"No Nuttz, No Glory!" - B's Friend From The Denva Lane Gang
AGAIN, WHAT WE'RE SEEING HERE WITH THESE NIGG UH EXCUSE ME BLACC MALES IS AN ANCIENT, PRIMAL IMPULSE TO ADVERTISE THEIR TESTICLE SIZE TO PROMISCUOUS BLACC FEMALES BECAUSE IT WAS THE PROMISCUOUS, ANCESTRAL BLACC FEMALE THAT DROVE THEIR TESTICLE SIZE TO INCREASE JUST AS IT WAS THE PROMISCUOUS ANCESTRAL, CHIMPANZEE FEMALE THAT SELECTED FOR LARGE, MALE CHIMPANZEE NUTTZ!
https://x.com/robkhenderson/status/1693033515116343675
.jpg)
AS G00D AS ADVERTISED!
More Proof That Niggers Are More Closely Related To Our Primate Relatives, Particularly Our Chimpanzee Cousins. How Is It Proof? because Chimpanzees Have The Largest Testicles Relative To Body Size Just As Niggers Have The Largest Testicle Size Among Humans (Large Testicle Size Indicating A Promiscuous Mating System, Which Niggers Have Just Like Chimpanzees)!
"They Say 'Spider Where You Get Ya Gall?' And I Respond 'I Was Born Wit 2 BIG Ol' Ballz!'" - Spider (Monkey) Loc
"No Nuttz, No Glory!" - B's Friend From The Denva Lane Gang
AGAIN, WHAT WE'RE SEEING HERE WITH THESE NIGG UH EXCUSE ME BLACC MALES IS AN ANCIENT, PRIMAL IMPULSE TO ADVERTISE THEIR TESTICLE SIZE TO PROMISCUOUS BLACC FEMALES BECAUSE IT WAS THE PROMISCUOUS, ANCESTRAL BLACC FEMALE THAT DROVE THEIR TESTICLE SIZE TO INCREASE JUST AS IT WAS THE PROMISCUOUS ANCESTRAL, CHIMPANZEE FEMALE THAT SELECTED FOR LARGE, MALE CHIMPANZEE NUTTZ!
.jpg)
AS G00D AS ADVERTISED!
Variation in testes size across ethnic groups. Testes size is used as an indicator of the intensity of sperm competition (males competing to inseminate a female) within a population.
More Proof That Niggers Are More Closely Related To Our Primate Relatives, Particularly Our Chimpanzee Cousins. How Is It Proof? because Chimpanzees Have The Largest Testicles Relative To Body Size Just As Niggers Have The Largest Testicle Size Among Humans (Large Testicle Size Indicating A Promiscuous Mating System, Which Niggers Have Just Like Chimpanzees)!
Testis size and sperm warfare in primates
Scientists previously proposed that chimps have large testicles
because several males mate with a single female, and so have to produce
more sperm in order to compete.
 |
...
|
The
researchers claim that these findings also support theories that sperm
production relates directly to reproductive competition and mating
behaviour.
Previous studies proposed that testes are smaller in
polygynous species such as gorillas where one alpha male monopolises
mating with multiple females.
In promiscuous species such as chimps however, there is greater competition between males as several copulate with one female.
|
This competition is thought to be the driving factor for sperm production and larger testes are thought to produce more sperm.
Replying to
That 25 is looking real chimpy
BIG BALLZ (MUCHO COJONEZ)
https://thehumanevolutionblog.com/2017/02/27/the-body-language-of-bonobos-and-the-evolution-of-human-language/
SIPPIN'
Origin Of The Tear Shedding Nigger After He's Inducted Into The Hall Of Fame!
MUG ON MEAN!
Dee Brown NO LOOK Dunk (The Origin Of The DAB; A lil DAB'll Do Ya!)
Look ME In The I! All From The I! Daniele Watts Hangin' From The Moonroof. Hang 10.
...it turns out that we are closer genetically to chimpanzees and bonobos...than they are to gorillas and orangutans. Indeed, Jared Diamond was spot-on in saying that, from a strictly genetic perspective, we are nothing more than a "third chimpanzee." (Denial. Ajit Varki.)
Chimps And Bonobos Have More Genes In Common With Humans Than They Do With Gorillas And Orangutans. So How Could You Say Humans Are Not Animals (Primates) Who Didn't Evolve From An Ancestor That They Shared In Common With Chimpanzees? YOU CAN'T.
Chimps And Bonobos Have More Genes In Common With Humans Than They Do With Gorillas And Orangutans. So How Could You Say Humans Are Not Animals (Primates) Who Didn't Evolve From An Ancestor That They Shared In Common With Chimpanzees? YOU CAN'T.
Yes, Shock That God Damn Monkey. Humans Are Just Apes Who've Evolved A
Little More Intelligence, A Little More Consciousness,
A Little More Culture (A More Sophisticated Culture), And Look A Little Differently Than Our Ape Cousins (Chimpanzees,
Bonobos, Gorillas Have More Body Hair And Primitive Physical Features). Other Than This, We're Essentially The Same As
Them. We're Driven By The Same Things (Sex And Survival) And We Try To
Solve Problems Related To Sex And Survival In A Similar Manner, Namely By Creating A Hierarchical Society Which Helps To Create Order, Organization, And Obedience in Society.
Gimme Monies! I Needs Monies! $5 Dolla!
NIGGERS Create Coalitions And Alliances With Other NIGGERS To Exploit Resources (Accumulate Wealth), Attain Status, And Dominate Females (Just Like Chimpanzees). Rappers And Their Crews Epitomize This Male Human Behavior. In Fact, Rappers Epitomize All Human Male Behavior, But In An Exaggerated Manner. They Conspicuously Consume, Display Forms Of Dominance, Lek, And Engage In All Other Forms Of Intrasexual Selection, But Too A Far Greater Degree Than Most People.
MONKEY MACCIN'
 |
| Hi Five! |
"We're All Perverts": The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality with Author Christopher Ryan
You Don't Want To Give Them To ME Paul? OK, I'll Try To Remember What I Wrote And Repeat It. Here Goes. So, Paul, You're Saying That We're Not Animals, We're Not A Part Of The Animal Kingdom, And We're Not At The Mercy Of The Dictates Of The Animal Kingdom (Survive, Attain Status And Resources, And Reproduce)? You're Saying That We're Unique, Soul Filled Beings, Created Separately From The Animal Kingdom, And Living Separately From The Animal Kingdom? Well Then Why Do We Share So Many Physical, Physiological, Psychological, Behavioral, And Social Traits With Animals, Particularly Primates? If We Aren't Animals, Why Are So Many Of The Traits That We Have Found In Rudimentary Form In Other Animals, Especially Primates?
Paul, Let's Take, For Instance, Consciousness, Altruism, Empathy, And Cooperation. The Precursors To These Psychological And Behavioral Traits Can Be Found In Our Non-Human Primate Cousins, The Great Apes (You See Glimpses Of This Behavior Among Chimpanzees, Bonobos, Etc). In Fact, The Precursors To Just About All Of Our Emotions, Drives, Gestures, And Behaviors Can Be Found In Nearly All Of Our Animal Ancestors, Which Makes Sense Since Humans Share The Same Organs And Organ Systems (Cardiovascular, Skeletal, Nervous, Etc.), Including The Components Of The Brain With Most Animals. The Difference, However, Paul, Is That Evolution, Specifically In The Form Of Sexual Selection And Group Selection, Has Taken Humans Down Such A Divergent Path From Other Animals That It's Made Humans Look And Act As If They Have No Genetic Or Biological Connection To Other Animals. We Can Think, Believe, Behave, And Live In Ways That Seem So Contrary To Animals, So Unique, And Unprecedented In The Animal Kingdom That, To The Untrained Eye, It's Easy To Believe That We're Not Animals And Thus Have No Genetic Or Biological Relation To Them. But This Is Just An Illusion Created By Evolution, Since All Of Our Mental And Physical Adaptations (Traits) Can Trace Their Origin To More Rudimentary Forms In Other Animals, Especially Primates.
That Was Mr. Paul Harvey Rite There!
"Africans Remained More Primitive (More Similar To Our Hominid Ancestors) While Populations, Particularly Eurasian Races, Evolving Outside Of Africa In Higher Latitudes Retained Fewer Of These Primitive, Ancestral African Traits." - Peter Dagampat Ph.D.
In Other Words, Niggers Are More Animal Like (Combative, Aggressive, Insolent, Insubordinate, Obstinate, Etc.) Because Their African Ancestors Evolved In An Environment (sub-Saharan Africa) That Didn't Place Much Of A Selective Pressure On Them To Evolve Psychological Traits That Were Different Than Their Chimpanzee, Gorilla, And Ancestral Hominid Relatives. (Chimpanzees Establish Dominance Hierarchies, Form Coalitions, And Gang Attack* Members To Eliminate Rivals And Gain Status; Niggers Are No Different.)
Not Only Do Africans And Blacks Bear A Stronger Physical Resemblance To Our Hominid Cousins (Bonobos, Chimpanzees, Gorillas) And Hominid Ancestors Than Do Any Other Races, But They Also Share Many Of The Same Mental And Behavioral Traits As Our Hominid Relatives.
Genetically, Africans And Their Descendants (Black Americans, Black British, West Indians, Etc.) Are The Most Closely Related Populations (Races) To Our Ape Relatives And Ancestors. Africans And Blacks Share Gene Variants (Alleles) With Our Ape Relatives And Ancestors That Non-African Populations Don't Possess. So, Blacks May Not Be Chimps Or Gorillas, But They're More Closely Related To Chimps And Gorillas Than Any Other Race (Other Races Don't Have These Non-Human Ape Alleles)."
Alex Mesoudi Retweeted
Good researchers hope to understand human diversity, not the mistaken idea that some living people are closer to our common ancestors.
"Runnin' Off Bustas!" - Lincoln Park Piru
"Chasin' Niggas Off They Own Block!" - Skyline Piru
"Pull Up On You In YO Hood And Chase YO Ass 'Round The Block" - B0
CHEW HIS ASS OUT...BITE HIS ASS...CHASE HIS ASS OFF!
(IN THAT ORDER!)
1. Chimp murder is “adaptive.” That is, it is an evolved trait that increases the reproductive success of the killers in some way. To test that, they looked at three predictions: members of the “eastern” clade should kill members of the “western” clade of chimps more often (presumably because of xenophobia); number of adult males in a group should correlate with more murders (the more males the more murders, since presumably it is the males who murder for reproductive advantage); and higher density of a group, which is said to reflect competition for resources and number of interactions, should also be associated with more murders.
It’s a shame that these aren’t great surrogates for what we want to know: do the killers have more offspring than non-killers? But that would be impossible to know, since the killers are males and you’d have to do paternity analysis on every chimp to see who the father was. Still, I’m not happy with these surrogates for adaptation. I suppose they’re the best the researchers could do given the data, but it makes the paper’s conclusions weaker.
2. Chimp murder is an artifact of human impact. The authors used three measures of disturbance as well: size of protected area covered by a group (the assumption is that smaller protected areas experience greater human impact); whether or not a group was artificially fed by humans; and “disturbance” (an amalgam of five variables including habitat disturbance, human harassment of chimps, hunting, habituation to humans, and elimination of predators [a sign of human impact]).
The results favored hypothesis #1: murder is adaptive. There was little support for the notion that human impact played any role. The authors note this (my emphasis):
Of the 16 models we considered (Table 3), four of the five models in the resulting 95% confidence set included combinations of the adaptive variables; the fifth model included the three human impact variables. The best model included only males and density, and was supported 6.8 times more strongly than the human impact model (evidence ratio = wi/wj = 0.40/0.059 = 6.8). Considering model-averaged parameter estimates22, increases in males and density increased the number of killings; for all other parameter estimates, the 95% confidence intervals included zero (Table 3 and Fig. 2). Excluding one community (Ngogo) that had both an unusually high killing rate and unusually many males resulted in similar values for model-averaged parameters, but only the estimate for density excluded zero from the 95% confidence interval (Extended Data Table 5b; n = 17).
Opposite to predictions from the human impact hypothesis (Table 2), provisioned and disturbance both had negative effects [i.e. reduced killing]; the estimates for these parameters included zero in the 95% confidence intervals (Table 3 and Extended Data Fig. 2b). The highest rate of killing occurred at a relatively undisturbed and never-provisioned site (Ngogo); chimpanzees at the least disturbed site (Goualougo) were suspected of one killing and inferred to have suffered an intercommunity killing; and no killings occurred at the site most intensely modified by humans (Bossou).Some other fun facts about chimpanzee murder:
- 92% of the killer chimps were male.
- The chimps most likely to be killed were other males and infants (killing someone else’s infant can be adaptive if you subsequently inseminate the mother of the victim
- Victims were usually members of other communities and hence unlikely to be related to the killers
- In killings observed, attackers outnumbered defenders by, on average, 8 to 1. Chimps attack in groups.
We conclude that patterns of lethal aggression in Pan show little correlation with human impacts, but are instead better explained by the adaptive hypothesis that killing is a means to eliminate rivals when the costs of killing are low.The implicit conclusion, I think, is that humans are innately warlike as well; that’s the reason why the paper got so much attention.
While I think it’s a good effort, there are problems with measuring disturbance and adaptiveness, though there’s no doubt that chimps kill each other in the wild, and they do it in relatively undisturbed areas. That tells us that chimps probably do murder in natural circumstances, but whether that’s adaptive or not is hard to gauge. (I’m not willing to say it’s adaptive just because it occurs.)
https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1256962406569345030
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/22/science/la-sci-chimps-20100622
"male chimps compete for access to small numbers of females, so they have an incentive to kill each other. But rival groups sometimes attack them, so they also have a reason to keep their fellow males around for support. It is a trade-off."
"male chimps compete for access to small numbers of females, so they have an incentive to kill each other. But rival groups sometimes attack them, so they also have a reason to keep their fellow males around for support. It is a trade-off."
The 0:03 Second Mark Of This Video. Multiple Black Nigga Males From The Same Neighborhood (Territory) Gang Attacking Another Black Nigga Male (A Rival) From A Different Neighborhood (Territory). This In No Different Than What We See When Chimpanzees Go On The Hunt And Attack A Lone Chimpanzee From A Different (Set) Territory. See Video Below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPznMbNcfO8
The 3:10 Mark. Although Human Gang Attacks And Chimpanzee Gang Attacks May Appear To Be The Result Of Differing Motives (Respect And Status For Humans, Territory And Resources For Chimps) The Unconscious, Underlying Reason For These Attacks Is The Same: SEX (Acquisition Of Females In Their Reproductive Prime). The Nigger Wants Nubile Nubian Queens To Fuck And Have Kids With Just Like The Chimp Wants Fertile And Fecund Females To Reproduce With!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7XuXi3mqYM
Listen To David Attenborough. He Could Just As Well Be Talking About Black Nigga Youths In The Inner City. If This Video Consisted Of Audio Alone Without Any Footage, You Could Have Just As Easily Assumed That David Were Describing The Gang Activity Of Black Nigga Males From South Central Los Angeles Going On The Hunt For Rival Males From A Different Gang/Territory. Listen To David Describe The Nigg Uh Excuse ME Chimps!
http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/war/Wrangham-coalitionaryx.pdf
One night during a brutal fight, they wounded Luit mortally - even going so far, in a gratuitous bit of Darwinian symbolism, as to rip out his testicles.
The 3:10 Mark. Although Human Gang Attacks And Chimpanzee Gang Attacks May Appear To Be The Result Of Differing Motives (Respect And Status For Humans, Territory And Resources For Chimps) The Unconscious, Underlying Reason For These Attacks Is The Same: SEX (Acquisition Of Females In Their Reproductive Prime). The Nigger Wants Nubile Nubian Queens To Fuck And Have Kids With Just Like The Chimp Wants Fertile And Fecund Females To Reproduce With!
Listen To David Attenborough. He Could Just As Well Be Talking About Black Nigga Youths In The Inner City. If This Video Consisted Of Audio Alone Without Any Footage, You Could Have Just As Easily Assumed That David Were Describing The Gang Activity Of Black Nigga Males From South Central Los Angeles Going On The Hunt For Rival Males From A Different Gang/Territory. Listen To David Describe The Nigg Uh Excuse ME Chimps!
http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/war/Wrangham-coalitionaryx.pdf
"Where His Balls Hangin'!" - Grape Street Watts Crip Gang Member
every human behavior is often a product of subterranean forces - rational forces perhaps, but not consciously rational.
https://twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/1021350296239292422
One Troop Of Chimps Excuse ME One Group Of Niggers Stalking (Hunting Down) And Attacking Another Group Of Niggers Leaving One Nigger Shoeless (A Rival Nigger Took His Shoes). HA HA HA!
Steve Stewart-Williams Retweeted
"Take That Monkey Shit Off You Embarrassing Yourself" - Pimpsy Ph.D.
"Them White Folkz Is Laughin' At You!"- Pimpsy Ph.D.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7XuXi3mqYM&feature=youtu.be
"NIGGERS ARE NO DIFFERENT" -Sihk The Shocker!
WHY DO I QUOTE ALL OF THESE NIGGER RAPPERS? BECAUSE THEY ALL MAKE REFERENCE TO THEIR NEXT OF KIN IN THEIR SONGZ (THEY ALL RAP ABOUT THEIR PRIMATE COUSINS; GORILLAS, CHIMPANZEES, ORANGUTANS, ETC.). THIS IS FURTHER PROOF THAT THEY'RE MORE CLOSELY RELATED TO THESE GREAT APE COUSINS THAN ANY OTHER HUMAN RACE. I MEAN, THEY'RE UNCONSCIOUSLY INFLUENCED TO GIVE THEM "SHOUT OUTS" IN THEIR SONGZ BECAUSE THEY FEEL A GREATER FILIAL CONNECTION TO THESE BEASTS! ISN'T THAT OBVIOUS? THE CLOSE GENETIC AND CULTURAL AFFILIATION THEY HAVE WITH THESE CREATURES?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7XuXi3mqYM&feature=youtu.be
"NIGGERS ARE NO DIFFERENT" -Sihk The Shocker!
WHY DO I QUOTE ALL OF THESE NIGGER RAPPERS? BECAUSE THEY ALL MAKE REFERENCE TO THEIR NEXT OF KIN IN THEIR SONGZ (THEY ALL RAP ABOUT THEIR PRIMATE COUSINS; GORILLAS, CHIMPANZEES, ORANGUTANS, ETC.). THIS IS FURTHER PROOF THAT THEY'RE MORE CLOSELY RELATED TO THESE GREAT APE COUSINS THAN ANY OTHER HUMAN RACE. I MEAN, THEY'RE UNCONSCIOUSLY INFLUENCED TO GIVE THEM "SHOUT OUTS" IN THEIR SONGZ BECAUSE THEY FEEL A GREATER FILIAL CONNECTION TO THESE BEASTS! ISN'T THAT OBVIOUS? THE CLOSE GENETIC AND CULTURAL AFFILIATION THEY HAVE WITH THESE CREATURES?
And my only book with full frontal nudity on the cover...okay in America because here most people believe we have no relation to those creatures.
Back to Darwin, @michaelshermer’s ‘Why Darwin Matters’ focuses on the narrower issue of the still (shamefully) raging arguments against evolution; and in particular where such thinking infringes policy and curriculums. A great account of some pivotal trials on the subject.
