"NO RELIGION IS THE NEW RELIGION...SHE SAID SHE DON'T BELIEVE IN G0D!" - Peter Dagampat Ph.D.
FICTION! THAT'S WHAT THE BIBLE CONSISTS OF!
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/13369076/houston-texans-arian-foster-goes-public-not-believing-god
ARYAN
I know they prayed on my downfall...
PREY ON IT MY NIGGAS!
... Love when ppl are successful and the first thing they do is pay homage to the man upstairs!...
I'm At An Intellectual* Point
In My Life Where I Really Can't Associate Or Even Talk To People Who
Think This Way (Who Believe In God And Praise Him Constantly And Do All
Of That Other Nonsense). These People And I Are Worlds Apart From Each
Other Psychologically. I Have Absolute Nothing In Common With Them. We
Have No Common Ground From Which To Speak Or Form A Relationship. Their
Minds Still Function Like A Child's While Mine Is Operating Like A High Functioning
Adult's. Know What I've Come To Realize Though? That This Difference
Isn't So Much A Result Of A Different Background, But Of Different
Mental Wiring. Educated, Intellectual, Atheists Have Genes And Neural
Wiring That Differ From The Genes And Neural Wiring Of Uneducated,
Non-Intellectually Inclined Theists (Unintelligent People Who Believe In
God). So All The Anti-Religion Writing I Do Won't Change A Thing. The
Only Way These People Will Change Is If They Undergo A Major Gene
Altering Procedure Or Have Brain Surgery (Neither Of Which Will Happen So They're Stuck In Fantasy Land). STUCK*Prison Intellect Pimpin'!
http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Belief_Instinct_The_Psychology_of_So.html?id=t-5zqdCp1-sC
This Book Has Changed My Outlook On Atheists. So Some Of My Speculation On This Blog About The Reason For Belief In God And The Practicing Of Religion Is Wrong. In Other Words, Some Of My Hypotheses As To Why People Believe In God And Practice A Religion Are Wrong, But That Doesn't Mean Your Belief In God And Practicing Of A Religion Is Right. No, Your Beliefs And Practices Are Still Wrong. Why Are They Still Wrong? Because Your Beliefs And Practices Are Based On Illusions (Your Brain Is Hardwired To Deceive You). More Than Anything Else, This Book Has Made ME Realize How Big Of A Role The Cognitive, Neurological, And Genetic Basis Of Religion Is. We're Born To Believe In God. Our Brain Is Setup This Way. Cultural Input (What Were Taught Growing Up Concerning God And Religion) Only Builds On This Innate Cognitive Bias (Religion Comes After The Fact, After The Fact That Our Brains Are Already Wired To Believe In God). Please Read Some Of The Sample Passages In The Link Above.
YOU THINK THAT THE DEVIL IS TELLING YOU TO ACT ON YOUR IMMORAL, SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE, BASE INSTINCTS? YOU THINK GOD IS TELLING YOU NOT TO? YOU'RE FUCKIN' DERANGED AND INSANE. NEITHER THE DEVIL, NOR GOD ARE TELLING YOU ANYTHING. WHY? BECAUSE NEITHER THE DEVIL, NOR GOD EXIST. KNOW WHO'S TELLING YOU SOMETHING, THOUGH? YOU. YOU'RE TELLING YOURSELF ALL OF THAT SHIT. THAT LITTLE VOICE IN YOUR HEAD THAT'S TELLING YOU TO ACT ON YOUR SELFISH, VIOLENT, SEXUAL, "IMPULSIVE, HEDONISTIC, AND UNINHIBITED" TENDENCIES, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME TELLING YOU THAT IF YOU DO ACT ON THESE "IMPULSIVE, HEDONISTIC, AND UNINHIBITED" TENDENCIES THERE COULD BE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS IS YOUR CONSCIENCE (YOUR THEORY OF MIND). AS YOU CAN SEE, HUMANS ARE INHERENTLY CONFLICTED. WE'RE BORN WITH A BRAIN THAT'S EVOLVED TO BE CONTRADICTORY. IT HOUSES ANCIENT DESIRES, DRIVES, AND EMOTIONS THAT ORIGINATE IN THE MORE PRIMITIVE PARTS OF OUR BRAIN, WHICH ARE AT ODDS WITH THE MORE RECENTLY EVOLVED PARTS OF OUR BRAIN, PARTICULARLY THE PREFRONTAL CORTEX, WHICH WORK TO SUBDUE THESE MORE SAVAGE DESIRES, DRIVES, AND EMOTIONS. ONE PART OF YOUR BRAIN IS TELLING YOU TO DO ONE THING AND THE OTHER PART IS TELLING YOU TO DO THE OPPOSITE AND THIS IS BECAUSE THERE'S A CONSTANT BATTLE BEING WAGED BETWEEN YOUR PRIMITIVE AND MODERN PARTS OF YOUR BRAIN AND YOUR SELF-AWARENESS (YOUR THEORY OF MIND) MAKES YOU CONSCIOUS OF ALL OF THIS. READ PAGES 170-172.
"WELL, IF I PULL OUT MY DICK IN THIS HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS OFFICE AREA AND BEGIN MASTURBATING TO IMAGES ON THE INTERNET (MAYBE SOME CHILD PORNOGRAPHY), THE HOTEL STAFF AND GUESTS MAY SEE THIS AND REPORT MY SEXUAL DEVIANCE TO NUMEROUS OTHER PEOPLE. THIS GOSSIP (THESE PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT ME MASTURBATING TO CHILD PORN) COULD THEN LEAD TO MY REPUTATION BEING DAMAGED AND TO ME BEING OSTRACIZED, WHICH COULD ULTIMATELY LIMIT MY REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS. MAYBE I SHOULDN'T MASTURBATE RIGHT HERE IN FRONT OF THESE PEOPLE. MAYBE I SHOULD DO IT IN THE BATHROOM." OR YOU MAY REASON, "IF I STEAL FROM THIS PERSON OR CHEAT HIM IN A BUSINESS DEAL (FUCK HIM OVER) AND PEOPLE FIND OUT ABOUT IT (ABOUT ME FUCKING HIM OVER) MY REPUTATION MAY BE SEVERELY AND PERMANENTLY DAMAGED (AND I MAY BE SEVERELY AND PERMANENTLY PHYSICALLY DAMAGED) AND THIS MAY LEAD TO PEOPLE NOT WANTING TO INTERACT WITH ME OR DO BUSINESS WITH ME. SO I BETTER NOT DO THIS.") READ PAGES 173-189.
LOOK AT WHAT GOSSIP DID TO JEFFREY DAHMER'S BROTHER (GOSSIP IN THE FORM OF THE MEDIA). LOOK AT WHAT IT DOES TO ALL SOCIALLY DEVIANT PEOPLE AND THEIR RELATIVES*. (YOUR REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND YOUR RELATIVES' REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS TAKE A HIT (CRASHES) WHEN YOU'RE FOUND OUT TO BE A SOCIALLY OR SEXUALLY DEVIANT PERSON.) AS A SIDE NOTE, IF ONE OF YOUR PARENTS OR ONE OF YOUR SIBLINGS HAS FAULTY GENES THAT LEAD THEM TO ENGAGE IN SOCIALLY OR SEXUALLY DEVIANT BEHAVIOR THERE'S A STRONG LIKELIHOOD THAT YOU YOURSELF HARBOUR THOSE FAULTY GENES (THEY'RE A PART OF YOUR GENOTYPE AS WELL). THIS IS THE REASON WHY I WOULD NEVER HAVE A CHILD WITH SOMEONE WHOSE PARENT(S) OR SIBLING(S) HAS COMMITTED A HEINOUS CRIME. READ PAGES 178-179. HEINOUS IN THE ANUS!
Jeffrey S. Sandusky, above, supported his father, Jerry, when he was on trial for child sexual abuse.
SEE WHAT I MEAN? IT RUNS IN THE FAMILY! THE FRUIT DOESN'T FALL FROM THE TREE!
Dr. John R. Hughes, a neurologist and longtime director of the Epilepsy Clinic at the University of Illinois College of Medicine and a colleague of Leestma, examined photos of the tissue in the 1990s along with brain wave tests performed on Speck in the 1960s. Hughes stated, "I have never heard of that [type of abnormality] in the history of neurology. So any abnormality that exceptional has got to have an exceptional consequence." Hughes attributes Speck's homicidal nature to a combination of the brain abnormalities, the violence Speck suffered at the hands of his alcoholic stepfather, and his own drinking and violence in Texas.
After Speck died, his body was not claimed. Duane Krieger, Will County coroner when Speck died, said he had talked to Richard Speck's sister: "She said they were afraid people would desecrate the grave if they had him buried out there." Krieger also stated that the sister "told her kids, 'You can never tell people Richard Speck was your uncle.'"
UNCLE!
RICHARD SPECK
(Snort Sum White Girl Up Off Huh Titties!)
(Snort Sum White Girl Up Off Huh Titties!)
In some mammal species, social stress can disrupt normal testis function. An experimental study of treeshrews conducted by behavioral physiologist Dietrich von Holst revealed extreme effects. When two males are caged together, one becomes dominant over the other within a few hours and the subordinate male increasingly shows symptoms of stress. As exposure to the dominant continues, the effects become progressively more severe. One early response is retraction of the testes from the scrotum back into the belly cavity. If the dominant male is removed, the testes quickly return to the scrotum and no lasting harm is done. Longer-lasting testis retraction shuts down sperm production, and actual physical decay of the testes eventually follows - the submissive male is emasculated.
How We Do It: The Evolution and Future of Human Reproduction. Martin, p. 16.
(A NEARLY SIMILAR PHYSIOLOGICAL, BIOCHEMICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE
OCCURS WHEN A DOMINANT HUMAN IS HOUSED WITH ANOTHER HUMAN(S) FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME AND EXERTS HIS OR HER DOMINANCE OVER THE OTHER(S). THIS IS ESPECIALLY APPARENT IN JAILS AND PRISONS.)
I'VE GOT A GRATE PASSAGE FROM WHY WE LIE THAT CORROBORATES THE POINT I MAKE IN THE PARAGRAPH BELOW!
GOD IS WATCHING YOU. YOU BETTER NOT DO THAT BECAUSE GOD IS WATCHING YOU AND HE'LL PUNISH YOU. NO HUMAN MAY SEE YOU DO THAT AND NO HUMAN MAY EVER PUNISH YOU FOR DOING THAT, BUT GOD SAW YOU DO THAT AND HE'S GOING TO PUNISH YOU IN THE HERE AND NOW OR THE THEREAFTER. IT'S UP TO HIM WHEN HE DECIDES TO PUNISH YOU, BUT BELIEVE ME, HE'S EVENTUALLY GOING TO PUNISH YOU. AND YOU'RE NOT GOING TO ENJOY THAT PUNISHMENT. YOUR MIND IS GENETICALLY WIRED TO THINK IN THIS DELUDED AND DERANGED WAY. READ PAGES 190-196
1:58 This Is A Cognitive Illusion, But It's A Cognitive Illusion...That Actually Had Some Significance Because It Gave Us The Impression That We're In A Social Relationship With A Grand Mind, Essentially, That Is Concerned About Our Moral Behaviors And That Inhibited Anti-Social Behaviors And Transgressions And Promoted Pro-Social Behaviors. 5:00 - 8:51 13:30 14:36
ESCUCHA ME!
(You Have The Mind Of A Child If You Believe In A G0D! You're Stuck In A Child-Like Stage Of Mental Development If You Believe In A G0D!)
(You Have The Mind Of A Child If You Believe In A G0D! You're Stuck In A Child-Like Stage Of Mental Development If You Believe In A G0D!)
The study also found that from 2007 to 2012, the percentage of people in
South L.A. who were obese or overweight increased from 63% to 75%,
while the obesity rate in the rest of the county increased from 57% to
58%. The analysis is based on data from the California Health Interview
Survey conducted by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.
Otis Wright, a minister at West Los Angeles Church of God in Christ,
sat in a corner of a Burger King in Baldwin Hills on Wednesday afternoon
with two buddies, sipping coffee and chowing down on chicken nuggets.
Wright said he was unaware of the fast-food restriction but said he was
not surprised that the data raised questions about its effect on the
health of residents. He said critics fail to see the time-saving role
that fast-food restaurants play in this working-class community.
"It's
a convenient way to eat when you are moving around — conducting
business and for a quick dinner," he said. "It might not be the most
nutritional, but it's fast and cheap."
Wright said he frequents
fast-food restaurants several times a week because they provide a clean
environment and allow him to have leisurely conversations.
"They are wholesome and fill a spot," he said.
RICHARD DAWKINS, I WOULD ASSIST MYSELF WHEN RESEARCHING. I'D HELP MYSELF TO SOME BOOKS.
DENIAL. YOU'RE ALL IN DENIAL.
Oh, The Genetic Revolution Would Also Have To Alter Our Capacity To Deny Reality. We Have A Mental Adaptation That Allows Us To Deny The Truth/Reality And This Would Have To Be Lost Or At Least The Strength Of It Diminished For Humans To Finally See The Truth* And Accept It.
*The Truth That God Doesn't Exist, The Truth That Heaven Doesn't Exist, And The Truth That Once We Die We're Gone FOREVER. In Other Words, Everything That Science Teaches, But Humans Can't Accept Because They're In Denial.
Join CARTA live! Ajit Varki discusses the "Mind Over Reality Transition": The Evolution of Human Mortality Denial
https://carta.anthropogeny.org/events/awareness-death-and-personal-mortality-implications-anthropogeny …
While were on the general subject of animal ancestry, one of the more creative accounts of the relationship between sex and disgust in human beings comes from the field of "terror management theory," which postulates that any disgust reactions we have to sex actually stem from the fear of our own mortality. Sex is so corporeal, or bodily, the argument goes, that it's a uniquely powerful reminder of our animal nature. And just like other animals we've got one-way tickets to Decomposition Central, which is a very scary place to us. It's so scary, terror management theorists claim, that if our brains were to dwell on this reality for too long, we'd become so paralyzed with fear that we'd no longer be able to function adaptively. Human beings coped with their awareness of death, these scholars believe, by inventing various cultural expressions of immortality to quell their existential fright. (All of this is presumably happening subconsciously, mind you.) And by the looks of it, the idea of sex presents some big challenges to our species in this uncomfortably mortal regard.
In one study, for instance, having people contemplate their own deaths caused them to favor a definition of sex in its more lofty, abstract forms (such as "love making" rather than "copulating"). Concepts like love and romance are said to be "symbolically immortal," helping to return the individual to a more manageable state of death anxiety. Presumably, this is why we're so enamored of slogans such as "A diamond is forever" and why poetic lines like Emily Dickinson's "Unable are the Loved to die / For Love is Immortality" strike a true and universal chord. Compare those maudlin sentiments with Shakespeare's lurid metaphor for sex in Othello as "making the beast with two backs" or his describing a couple as "prime as goats" and "hot as monkeys." You'd find Shakespeare's language here especially gross, the argument goes, right after being told you've got an inoperable brain tumor and have only a few months to live. Like another famous theory that's based on subconscious anxieties, it has its limits, but I think there's probably something to terror management theory. It could explain Rick Santorum believing gay marriage is a stone's throw away from interspecies marriage, anyway. That poor man - the mere act of ejaculating, reminding him that he's an animal, must be so existentially terrifying to him. (PERV)
I Was Flipping The Channel And Saw This Woman Speaking On A Christian
Show And Was Surprised Bi How Naïve And Childlike Her Reasoning Was. The Gist of Her Anti-Science Argument Was That Science Requires A Lot Of
Education To Understand And Once You Understand It It Doesn't Give You
Any Hope. It's Ultimate Message Is That Life Is Meaninglessness And,
From Her Perspective, Who Wants To Believe In Something That's Hard To
Understand And Doesn't Provide Optimism (i.e. Life Has No Meaning)?
I
Believe Ray Lewis, Like Most Religious People, Especially Black
Religious People, Reasons About Science In A Similar Manner. They Think
To
Themselves "I Ain't Gon' Try Ta Figure All That Shit Out. That's Too
GoDDamn Much To Read, Too GoDDamn Hard To Understand, Too GoDDamn
Hopeless, And Too GoDDamn Troublesome To My Negroid Mind And Life. God Exists. I
Know He Does. I Can Feel Him!" (They'd Rather Go With Their Intuition
And What Appeals To The Mental Biases That Their Mind Evolved.)
Their
Rationale Confirms The Fact That Belief In God And The Practicing Of
Religion (Superstition) Comes Naturally To Humans (Our Minds Are Biased
To Think This Way) While Science Is Contrary To How We Evolved To Arrive At
Answers And Contrary To What Our Minds Evolved To Believe. With Science
You Have To Override Your Innate Psychological Tendencies (Adaptations)
To Reach Answers That Are Not In Accordance With What Your Mind Wants
You To Believe And Most People Can't And Don't Want To Do This.
I Shouldn't Say "What Your Mind Wants You To Believe" Because That's Attributing A Conscious Intent To Your Mind. Instead, What I'm Implying Is That Your Brain Is Evolved And Genetically Wired To Believe That A Supernatural Power Exists, Created The World, Is Watching You, And Will Meet You When You Die (Your Brain Evolved For You To Intuitively Believe All Of This).
I Didn't Write The Above Paragraph Well. Here's What I Was Trying To Say. Ray And Christine Reason, "Why Don't You Believe In Something That's Easy To Understand And Gives You Meaning, Purpose, And Hope In Life Rather Than Something That's Difficult To Grasp, Difficult To Apply To Your Life And Won't Give You Any Purpose, Meaning, Or Hope In Your Life?" In Other Words, They'd Rather Deceive Themselves And Disregard Or Deny The Truth, So That They Can Have Peace Of Mind. And Maybe A Piece Of Pie. Devil's Pi!