Monday, August 4, 2014

There's A Monkey On Your Back (This Monkey's Gone To NeveaH)

 Pinned Tweet
Dear medical community, matters. Let me tell you why.
https://twitter.com/ApeActionAfrica
 https://twitter.com/SavingGorillas
https://twitter.com/SavingGorillas
https://twitter.com/IPSConservation
"Planet Of The Apes" - Coon (The Con Federation)
 Sep 13
World’s Largest Primate, The Mighty Eastern Gorilla, Eaten to Near Extinction By Rwandan Refugees
WE EATON OVER HERE!

"In The Streets I Done Turn Into Go-Rilla!" - Joe Moe
"A 5 Star Gorilla Crip!" - M. Minister 

"IMMA FAMILIA GORILLA!" - U.N.L.V.
 "Really A Gaiili[?] For Those That Don't Know That Mean Gorilla In Swahili!" - Mr. Newton
You See Human Males, Particularly Blacc Ones, Behaving The Same Way When They Perceive To Have Been Insulted (Slighted) Or When Their Status Is Challenged By A Rival Male(s) Or When They're Among A Group Of Males And Trying To Establish Dominance Or Their Position In The Pecking Order (Establish Their Status Among Male Acquaintances, Male Rivals, Or Male Strangers).

Percy "Perceived To Be" Percival Miller! 
"MONKEYS HIT THE GROUND[?] WHEN GORILLAS IS ON THE PROWL!" - Treali Deuce McCallister!

 http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/2009/08/11/i-have-developed-something-of/
On hearing, one June afternoon in 1860, the suggestion that mankind was descended from the apes, the wife of the Bishop of Worcester is said to have exclaimed, ‘My dear, descended from the apes! Let us hope it is not true, but if it is, let us pray that it will not become generally known.’ As it turns out, she need not have been quite so worried: we are not descended from the apes, though we do share a common ancestor with them. Even though the distinction may have been too subtle to offer her much comfort, it is nevertheless important.

 "Monkey Shit Is Not Alloooooowed! So Getcho Monkey Ass From Aroooooound Me!" - Ralo Da Piiiiiimp

"WE GORILLAS NOT MONKEYS!" - Parkside Piru Cillie Cider!

I'M GOING TO UPDATE MY SHOCK THE MONKEY POST LATER TODAY. I'M GOING TO ADD SOME PICTURES AND PASSAGES THAT YOU MIGHT LIKE. (I'LL DO THIS TOMORROW (11/30). I UPDATED IT IN THE MONKEY POST ABOVE. I WASN'T GOING TO BE ABLE TO FIT THE WRITING AND PHOTOS IN THE MONKEY POST INTO MY SHOCK THE MONKEY POST SO I CREATED A NEW POST FOR IT, THE MONKEY POST ABOVE.) MONKEY SEA MONKEY DEW. MONKEY SEADOO.

"IMMA FAMILIA GORILLA!" - U.N.L.V.

THIS GORILLA (KOKO) HAD A GREATER (MORE POSITIVE) IMPACT ON THE HUMAN SPECIES THAN ANY ATHLETE, ARTIST, ACTOR, ACTRESS, MUSICIAN, COMEDIAN, ETC. EVER HAS OR EVER WILL! ESPECIALLY THE NIGGERS!
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/06/gorillas-koko-sign-language-culture-animals/
http://news.janegoodall.org/2018/06/22/dr-goodall-remembers-koko-the-gorilla/
https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1059119814214598656

Scientist's obituary on Koko, the famous gorilla lady, goes as far as to imply that she could understand spoken English language.

"Gorilla Warfare" - Mikey Black
Niggers Are Like Apes (We're All Apes, But They're More So). Don't Believe ME? Watch!

https://www.amazon.com/Next-Kin-My-Conversations-Chimpanzees/dp/0380728222


"What A Fucked Up Family Picture!" - Lil Wang


"Imma Untamed Gorilla" - J Man471 (Bompton)
"UNTAMED...UNCHAINED" - CHALE MANE
"A Gorilla, Untamed! Nigga Know My Name!" - M.S.G.

"My Technique Is Gorilla...Imma Fuckin' Gorilla!"- Mac Minister Dogg

One of the most pronounced physical differences between the sexes is in muscle mass. Men pack more muscle fibers into any given species in the body and have 80 percent more muscle mass in their upper body than women, and 50 percent more in their legs. As far as upper body strength, this translates to a three-standard-deviation difference in strength. That is, again, of a thousand men off the street, 997 would have a stronger upper body than the average woman. 

"The differences in upper body strength are about what you see in gorillas," Geary says. "That's very big. Gorillas are the most sexually dimorphic of our close relatives. The males are about twice the size of the females. So the overall size difference is more than in humans, but the difference in upper body strength is similar." 

The reason for the similarity to gorillas reflects how sexual selection has shaped human (and gorilla) athleticism. If you want to know whether the male or female of a given species is bigger and stronger, one piece of information is particularly useful: which sex has the higher potential reproductive rate.  

Because of a long gestation and breastfeeding period, a female gorilla can produce only one offspring about every four years. Male gorillas collect and defend harems of females and have a much higher potential reproductive rate. But for each male gorilla that has a harem, several other males are frozen out of breeding altogether. The result is that male gorillas compete fiercely for access to multiple females, and this "male-male competition" takes the form of fighting, or at least posturing to fight, and natural selection accentuates traits that make gorillas better fighters." (The Sports Gene)
 
"I Come Go-Rilla...Kill Foe Village Uh" - Ike Dola Tha Motha Fukkin' Hoe Controlla




SONS OF THE CONGO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWBNOEugSlg
 Pay Special Note To The Gorilla Like Dominance Display At The 0:08 Mark (The Beating On The Chest, The Swaying To And Fro, And The Stomping On The Flo!). This Is Further Proof That Russell [Westbrook] Is More Closely Related To The Western Gorilla Gorilla Than Any Of The Other West African Basketball Playing Cohort! The Gorilla Like Posturing Comes To Him Automatically And Instinctively In His Play! (I Was Waiting For Him To Finish Off His Act By Uprooting The Basket Or At Least Uprooting A Basketball Fan From His/Her Seat And Dragging Him/Her Across The Flo!)

"Planet Of The Apes...Straight Gorillas!" - Da Gunman

https://x.com/shi_huang5/status/1785125019376636221
Shi Huang 黄石
@shi_huang5
That African DNA is the closest to chimpanzees is an open secret among a small circle of experts. No one (dare) discusses its significance, so it is unknown to most. There are many papers on this. The one with the most complete data is (Extended Fig 5).
https://x.com/TruePhilocalist/status/1790067701693465006
Shi Huang 黄石
@shi_huang5
Africans the last to become modern homo based on 3 open secrets. 1. More similar to chimpanzees in DNA than others do. 2. Highest genetic diversity but becoming higher species is associated with lower GD. 3. Largest # of protein truncating variants.
https://x.com/shi_huang5/status/1958027349066412281
Shi Huang 黄石
@shi_huang5
The first modern people at ~50-200 kya should have more fixed differences from chimpanzees than other contemporaneous people, which is partly why they were modern. They have more derived alleles (non-chimp) and less ancestral/primitive alleles and hence have more modern traits.

Retweeted
Mar 21 
Good researchers hope to understand human diversity, not the mistaken idea that some living people are closer to our common ancestors.
http://www.academia.edu/14225650/Paradoxes_of_Dehumanization

"Beatin' My Chess Like King Khan!" - Kublai

"Gorilla Like Mighty Joe [Joe Frazier]...Donky Kong I Mean." - Macnificent The Great
RUSSELL WESTBROOK OR TOM JACKSON (ESPN NFL COUTDOWN HOST) THINKING.
HMM. 
ME TRYNA FIGURE OUT HOW IMMA GET IN THE CLUB, MICHAEL EAVES!
RUSSELL WESTBROOK EATON OR TOM JACKSON (ESPN NFL COUNTDOWN) EATON.

"SHAKE THAT MONKEY" - SHOWT DAWG
"Put That Monkey On That Banana!" - T Y (THAI) $1 SIGN









Walkin' Buy LOVE! (After I Was Sodomized By A GanG Of NIGGERs! They Ran Thru ME, Then Ran ME Off!)
"Somethin' To Run Thru!" - Treali Deuce McCalister

"SASQUATCH PIMPIN'" - DON PERIGNON
https://instagram.com/p/0_dQX_ySYK/?taken-by=chrisryanphd
Bill Walton In His HEYDAY Dicking Ryan Down! "Dick 'Em Down, Big Fella!" - Bill
Dugum Dani!

 "...We Blacc Gorillas..." - Spider (Monkey) Loc


"100 CRIP!" -DA GUNMAN 
PHOTOS TAKEN FROM THE FOLLOWING BOOKS:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Great-Apes-Natures-Mirror/dp/0713724889
https://www.amazon.com/Primates-Alfred-L-Rosenberger/dp/1032189932
http://www.amazon.com/World-Atlas-Great-their-Conservation/dp/0520246330
https://www.amazon.com/Monkeys-Apes-Gorillas-Other-Primates/dp/1838861009
https://www.amazon.com/Primates-Perspective-Christina-Campbell/dp/0195390431
http://www.amazon.com/Among-Great-Apes-Adventures-Relatives/dp/B006OHYRL6
http://www.amazon.com/Origins-Evolution-Revealed-Douglas-Palmer/dp/1845334744
https://www.amazon.com/Primate-Adaptation-Evolution-John-Fleagle/dp/0128158093

https://www.amazon.com/Primates-Fearless-Science-Goodall-Galdikas/dp/1250062934
https://www.amazon.com/Ape-Martin-Jenkins/dp/0763649740
https://www.amazon.com/Remembering-Great-Apes-Wildlife/dp/1999643305
https://www.amazon.com/Just-Like-Veterinarians-Vanishing-Relatives/dp/173488021X

RES ERECTUS

The individual fish in a school do not recognize one another; they do not need to. But the individual chickens in a pecking order do recognize one another. If you form a new flock by putting together ten unacquainted hens or roosters, a power struggle will begin immediately. A pair of birds will peck at each other, or threaten to do so, until one concedes defeat, thus establishing a dominant-submissive relationship between them. Once that has been established there is no longer any need to fight: the one with the lower status simply gives way to the one with higher status, and peace reigns. The flock has become a smoothly functioning superorganism. Dominance hierarchies are beenficial not only to the winners (who thereafter get first access to food and mates) but also to the losers (who thereafter get beaten up less often and less severely). Both winners and losers get the advantages of being members of a group. An isolated bird is a sitting duck, so to speak, for predators.

The pecking order in chickens depends on their recognizing each other and remembering their past encounters, but their memories are nowhere near as good as that of the proverbial elephant, the one who never forgets. Chickens get mixed up if their flock numbers more than ten (dominance hierarchies are unstable in larger flocks), and a flockmate that takes a vacation is soon forgotten. If you remove a chicken from the flock and put it back in a week, it will resume its place in the hierarchy, but after a three-week absence it will have to reestablish its rank all over again. So a chicken's mental lexicon for chickens doesn't contain many pages and the ink fades quickly. But who would have expected a chicken to have a mechanism for recognizing individuals and behaving appropriately to them?  

Now let's take another step downwards in brain size. How about paper wasps? Yes, paper wasps, which live in colonies and construct communal nests (those papery gray things you sometimes see attached to tree branches or the eaves of houses) have dominance hierarchies. Colonies are founded anew each spring by females that survive the winter; several females that overwinter in the same hideout will cooperate in starting a new colony. But the cooperation is at first of a belligerent sort: in the early days they interact aggressively with one another. Soon a dominance hierarchy emerges and there is a sharp reduction in fighting.

Among paper wasps, the payoff for being the alpha female is considerable: she gets to be the chief egg layer of the colony. The others lay an occasional egg, but Alpha tolerates no nonsense: if she spies an egg that isn't hers, she eats it. Before long the ovaries of the other wasps recede and they stop trying. They become workers in the nest, helping to rear Alpha's children. They stay because a paper wasp can't survive on its own and because there is always the possibility that Alpha might die and they can move up in the hierarchy (in which case their ovaries will grow back). Also, there is a good chance that Alpha is their sister, so the young they help to rear might be their nieces and nephews.

Believe it or not, there is evidence that paper wasps are capable of some sort of limited recognition of individual nestmates. But recognition, strictly speaking isn't necessary: dominance hierarchies in this species may be established and maintained by means of feedback loops.

...

Here's how positive feedback loops could produce dominance hierarchies in paper wasps. Assume that winning and aggressive encounter causes some change - hormonal, perhaps - in the winner. This change signals her status to potential rivals and thereby makes her more likely to prevail in future showdowns. By behaving in a certain way and/or emitting the right kind of pheromones, she exudes the wasp equivalent of self-confidence. The wasps below her in the dominance hierarchy might be responding to these signals, rather than remembering what happened the last time they made the mistake of dissing Alpha.

Positive feedback loops of this sort are not restricted to species with wasp-size brains. They are observable in animals that are clearly capable of remembering every member of their group - wolves and monkeys, for example. According to the evolutionary biologist E.O. Wilson,       
The identity of the leading male in a wolf pack is unmistakable from the way he holds his head, ears, and tail, and the confident, face-forward manner in which he approaches other members of his group. He controls his subordinates in the great majority of encounters without any display of overt hostility...Similarly, the dominant rhesus [monkey] male maintains an elaborate posture signifying his rank: head and tail up, testicles lowered, body movements slow and deliberate and accompanied by unhesitating but measured scrutiny of other monkeys the cross his field of view.
...

The unhesitating scrutiny with which the alpha male looks at the other monkeys in his group is a mark of his status. In the hierarchical power domain, looking directly at another is a challenge. If two individuals - monkeys, apes, or humans - happen to make eye contact, the lower-ranked one indicates submission by looking down or away. If he maintains eye contact, he's responding to the challenge by issuing a challenge of his own.

In the previous chapter I described a mental module that Simon Baron-Cohen called an "eye-direction detector" and which I will rename, for compactness, the "gaze detector." The gaze detector tells you where someone is looking - in particular, whether someone is looking at you. What you do with that information depends on what kind of relationship you have with the other person - or, to put it in Bugental's terms, which domain of social life is currently in play. In the hierarchical power domain, prolonged eye contact means "I challenge you." In the mating domain, it means "I love you." In the first case it can lead to a fight; in the second one, to sex.

Human Peacocking
@HumanPeacocking
Attention in social contexts is largely organised through status Arguably status is all about attention! We look/listen to higher status people when events occur

Briefer glances also have different meanings in the two domains. In the mating domain they are used in flirting. In the hierarchical domain, they are a sign of what the ethologist Michael Chance has called the "attention structure" of a group. The alpha male in a primate group is not distinguished by HOW MANY GLANCES HE DIRECTS TOWARD THE OTHERS BUT BY HOW MANY GLANCES HE RECEIVES: he receives by far the most. In general, high-ranked individuals are looked at more than those in lower ranks. Because the lower-ranked individual has to yield to a higher-ranked one, he has to keep track of where his superiors are and what they are doing. If these glances should happen to result in eye contact, he quickly averts his eyes.

"Y U OVER THERE LOOKIN' AT ME...STANDIN' HERE!"- EAST COAST CRIP!

Rank in primate groups is not a simple matter; several factors are involved in determining an individual's status. Males and females generally have separate hierarchies, with all or most of the males able to dominate all or most of the females. Another important factor is kinship. An individual who has high-status relatives in the group can call on their help in a dispute with the members of other families.


It pays to belong to a powerful family. A recent study of baboons living in a game reserve in Botswana showed that these monkeys are keenly aware both of family connections and of power hierarchies within their troop. The researchers made auditory tapes of the baboons' noisy altercations and then pieced together sequences that sounded (to a baboon)  as if one animal was asserting dominance and the other was yielding. The baboons who heard these phony sequences appeared to be more disturbed or puzzled (judging by how long they looked in the direction of the sounds) by sequences that involved status reversals - either a low-status animal getting the best of a high-status one from the same family, or an animal from a low-status family getting the best of one from a high-status family. But they were clearly more troubled by the latter type of reversal. The researchers concluded that baboons classify other baboons both by individual rank and by family, and that they understand that changes in the rank ordering of families are more disruptive.



 All Of The Lower Class Black And Brown Kids Beat ME! They Beat ME In Basketball And Beat ME Up! I'm Just A Weak, Lil White, Wimp (A Beaten Beta, Leanne (Leanne Is A GOOK/NIP That Once Did Accounting Here https://www.yelp.com/biz/makino-chaya-aiea She, Along With A Number Of Other Female Employees, Was Attracted To ME))!

The results of this experiment also show that baboons can recognize individual members of their troop by the sound of their voices as well as by sight. Either form of recognition will lead them to the lexicon page for the particular baboon - a page that contains, not only information about their own kinship with that individual, but also information about its kinship with others in their troop.

Now we come to the chimpanzee. Dominance in this species depends not only on physical power and family connections, but also on alliances between nonrelatives. When two chimpanzees come to blows, explained the Dutch primatologist Frans de Waal,
A third ape may decide to enter the conflict and side with one of them. The result is a coalition of two against one. In many cases the conflict extends still further, and larger coalitions are formed...Chimpanzees act selectively when intervening in a conflict between other members of the group. All the group members have their own personal likes and dislikes which dictate how they act. The choices they make are biased choices, which generally remain constant over the years. This does not mean to say that relationships in the group do not change; indeed, this is the most fascinating aspect of chimpanzee coalitions. Why should C, who has supported A against B for years, gradually begin to support B against A?
Something like that happened in the chimpanzee colony in the Arnhem Zoo in the Netherlands, where de Waal spent several years observing the primates. When he arrived at the zoo, the alpha male, A, was a dignified old chimpanzee named Yeroen, still physically powerful but beginning to show signs of age. B was Luit, a little younger but equally big and strong, and C was Nikkie, the youngest and most boisterous of the three, still gaining in size and strength.

For more than two years, A was the top banana. Then B began to challenge his supremacy. C sided with B and their coalition was successful in overthrowing A, so that both B and C became dominant over A. But now that A was acting submissive to C, C began a campaign against B and obtained A's cooperation. With A's backing, C toppled B and became the alpha male.

Such changes in status are accompanied by changes in behavior and demeanor. The alpha male looks very self-confident as long as he's the alpha male, but observed de Waal, "As soon as his position is seriously threatened, the self-confidence may disappear completely." The other chimpanzees are well aware of what is going on. Each adult member of the colony has to know who's currently on top, who's plotting a coup, and who's supporting each contender. The pages in a chimpanzee's lexicon have to be kept up-to-date.

Earlier I said that the dominance hierarchy is the result of pairwise interactions between individuals. That is true despite the existence of coalitions of the sort de Waal described. Chimpanzee A may be dominant over B either because he is bigger and stronger or because he has the support of C. In either case the relationship between A and B is one of dominance and submission.

Dominance hierarchies have also been observed in groups of human children. The cross-cultural psychologist Carolyn Edwards studied the multi-age play groups of traditional small-village societies and reported,
Older children respond to others younger and smaller than themselves by establishing dominance over them...Accordingly, a pecking-order of size and strength consistently emerges in multi-age groups, certainly in the multi-age play group of siblings, half-siblings, and courtyard cousins found in most of our samples.

In societies where children go to school and children's groups consist mostly of nonrelatives of roughly the same age, individuals who are taller or stronger than their agemates are likely to have higher status, especially in boys' groups. Researchers have studied children in nursery schools and found attention structures similar to those reported in other primates: high-status children are looked at more.

But in humans - even in boys - the attention structure is not identical to the dominance hierarchy. The child with the highest position in the attention structure is not necessarily the largest or most aggressive; he or she may instead be an organizer or initiator - one who thinks up interesting games and persuades others to participate in them. A child can have high status in a group without being at the top of the dominance hierarchy. In humans - I'll return to this point in a later chapter - status is complex and multidimensional.

The dominance hierarchy of a group depends on who's in it at the moment. If A is absent, the remaining members may simply move up a rung or, if coalitions are involved, there may be other repercussions: without A's support, B may lose his dominance over C. When a group splits up into two smaller groups or two groups coalesce, an individual's rank is likely to change. In ancestral times, when human families foraged together in small, temporary groups, a child's position in the dominance hierarchy might shift upwards or downwards whenever the adults decided to make a switch. A boy who could, for a while, dominate all the other boys in the play group might be quickly demoted when a family with a larger, stronger boy joined up. If children in ancestral times sooner or later became acquainted with all other children in their clan, they must also have learned which ones they could dominate and which could dominate them.

As de Waal observed, the behaviors associated with being the alpha male depend on remaining the alpha male; the ex-alpha has lost, not only his status, but also his air of self-confidence. Whether one behaves in a dominant or submissive fashion depends on one's rank in a particular group at a particular time. This is why a child who has been dominated for years by an older sibling can become a dominant member of a group of agemates - or, for that matter, of any group that does not happen to include the older sibling.   

No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality. Harris, p. 175-181. 
Cutting trough the nice guy, alpha male,
Low Status Male Chimpanzees Exhibit The Same Behavioral And Personality* Traits As Low Status Male Humans. They Tend To Be Socially Anxious And Avoid Eye Contact And Actual Contact With Dominant Males And Even Females (i.e. Shifty Eyes, Sweaty Palms, Shaky, Cracking Voice, Reluctance To Interact With Groups And Individuals, And Uneasiness While Interacting With Groups And Individuals).

*Insecure And Unsure Of Himself! 

I C U LOOKIN'!


National Geographic Going Ape : Hooking Up (S01E02) Full Episode



WICCED NIGGA!

TUOMAS & MAC

 http://vengeanceizmine.blogspot.com/2014/06/no-love-feelings-hurt-ready-to-cry.html

To some degree paraphilias represent the desperation of relatively low-ranking individuals who have normal sex drives but lack the wherewithal to court successfully. For example, one of Judith's patients was a self-proclaimed sadistic paraphiliac. Caught painfully in a fear of both sexes, he developed an "addiction" to satanic images and black magic, engaging in blood rituals that he performed alone as an expression of rage at himself and the world. He masturbated to images of blood and bondage because he was afraid of anything more intimate and hated his shyness and everyone else for having more fun in life. (Making Sense Of Sex)

"A Scared Man Can't Win" - Lil Bruce Bruce
Posted by at