Wednesday, April 30, 2025

So Looone Lei So Looone Lei So Loooooone Leeeiii (Tha Po Lease)

"Loneliness needs to be understood [...] as a relatively recent invention, dating from around 1800." journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11


Friends by Robin Dunbar
"loneliness is an evolutionary alarm signal that something is wrong...Even just the perception of being socially isolated can be enough to disrupt your physiology...that, if unchecked, can lead to a downward spiral and early death" amzn.to/3Ftjpmk

In fact, evidence has been growing that when our need for social relationships is not met, we fall apart mentally and even physically. There are effects on the brain and on the body. Some effects work subtly, through the exposure of multiple body systems to excess amounts of stress hormones. Yet the effects are distinct enough to be measured over time, so that unmet social needs take a serious toll on health, eroding our arteries, creating high blood pressure, and even undermining learning and memory.

A lack of close friends and a dearth of broader social contact generally bring the emotional discomfort or distress known as loneliness. It begins with an awareness of a deficiency of relationships. This cognitive awareness plays through our brain with an emotional soundtrack. It makes us sad. We might feel an emptiness. We may be filled with a longing for contact. We feel isolated, distanced from others, deprived. These feelings tear away at our emotional well-being.

Despite the negative effects of loneliness, it can hardly be considered abnormal. It is a most normal feeling. Everyone feels lonely sometimes—after a break-up with a friend or lover, when we move to a new place, when we are excluded from some social gathering.

Chronic loneliness is something else entirely. It is one of the surest markers in existence for maladjustment.

In children, it leads to all kinds of problems. Failure to be socially connected to peers is the real reason behind most school dropouts. It sets in motion a course on which children spin their way to outcast status and develop delinquency and other forms of antisocial behavior.

In adults, loneliness is a major precipitant of depression and alcoholism. And it increasingly appears to be the cause of a range of medical problems, some of which take decades to show up.


We’ve all experienced loneliness from time to time. Indeed, even the most popular, social butterflies among us have likely felt the yearning for social connection, or the pang of sadness from being unable to talk to a close friend now and again. This is a completely natural feeling to have, as humans are an incredibly social species. In fact, it’s arguable that we survive best by being part of a large group (Rokach, 2018). As a result, being alone or left out of a group causes the inevitable feeling that we experience as loneliness.

But although feeling lonely is a normal part of being human, it doesn’t mean that loneliness—especially prolonged loneliness—is healthy. In fact, while we think of loneliness as a sad condition, it is also a potentially threatening one. Several studies have even shown that social isolation can literally kill you. In an analysis of 70 studies on over 3 million participants, researchers found that increased risk of premature death was between 26 and 32 percent higher in individuals who were lonely or socially isolated (Holt-Lunstad, et al., 2015). The authors of this study point out that obesity and smoking, which get constant media attention, lead to the same risk for premature death as loneliness.

You might be asking, how on earth is that possible? Scientists believe that since humans evolved to live in groups, being alone would make you more vulnerable to threats. And indeed, research suggests that being lonely is associated with paying more attention to threatening social information. For example, when presented with photos of threatening and non-threatening faces, the brains of lonely adults process threatening information more quickly than do adults who aren’t lonely (Cacioppo et al., 2015). This suggests that feeling lonely puts our bodies on high alert, responding more quickly to threat than we typically would. While this hypervigilance can be adaptive when there really is imminent threat to worry about, it also takes a toll on the body: Making us more attentive to threat increases our stress hormones, which thereby increases our blood pressure and impacts the functioning of our immune systems (Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2014).

There is also direct evidence that loneliness has an immediate impact on your brain. For example, one group of researchers showed that after periods of being socially isolated, adults show activation in similar brain regions that are active when we’re hungry (Tomova et al., 2020). Another study looked at adults’ brains during an activity after researchers convinced them that they were being excluded from a game with their peers. The parts of the brain that were most active when the adults thought they were being excluded are the same parts of the brain that are active when you feel physical pain (Eisenberger, Lieberman, & Williams, 2003). On top of that, when given acetaminophen, a common painkiller that’s in over-the-counter drugs like Tylenol, the brain’s response to being excluded is diminished (DeWall et al., 2010).

This all suggests that loneliness literally hurts. So, it’s time to start taking loneliness seriously, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic where people are being forced into social isolation.



The Social Leap
“loneliness in late adulthood is deadlier than smoking. Indeed, once you’re over 65, you’re better off smoking, drinking, and overeating with your friends than you are sitting at home alone.” amzn.to/3oGXbVI


In a world that is more connected than ever, loneliness has reached epidemic proportions. Paradoxically, our ability to send a message across the globe in seconds has not made it easier to feel truly seen or understood. In fact, a survey of 20,000 U.S. adults show that nearly 50 percent of people report feeling lonely regularly. What’s driving this sense of isolation, and more important, how can we rediscover the sense of belonging that is essential to our well-being?

Why Belonging Matters: A Biological Imperative

Belonging isn’t just a nice-to-have; it’s wired into our very survival. As social creatures, our ancestors thrived in groups, relying on shared resources and mutual protection.

Evolution has left its imprint—being connected to others triggers the release of oxytocin, often called the “bonding hormone,” which reduces stress and fosters trust. Conversely, loneliness activates the brain’s threat response, making us hyper-aware of perceived dangers.

This is why loneliness isn’t just an emotional experience—it’s a health risk. Chronic loneliness has been linked to higher rates of depressionanxiety, cardiovascular disease, and even a shortened lifespan. The science is clear: Belonging is as essential to our well-being as food or shelter.

LONELINESS AS A RESULT OF OSTRACISM, EXCLUSION, AND SOCIAL ISOLATION. CHIMPANZEES EXPERIENCE SIMILAR EMOTIONS AS WE HUMANS AS A RESULT OF SIMILAR SOCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200811/when-inclusion-costs-and-ostracism-pays-ostracism-still
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/choke/201203/dealing-the-pain-social-exclusion
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-time-cure/201302/shunning-the-ultimate-rejection
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-time-cure/201303/shunning-the-ultimate-rejection-part-ii

If there's a kid at school sitting alone at lunch, go ask if you can join them. Inclusion changes lives.

"HUMANS ARE SOCIAL BY NATURE AND CRAVE BEING A PART OF A GROUP (ANY GROUP). WE'RE INHERENTLY DRIVEN TO BE INCLUDED AND IF WE'RE NOT, IF WE FIND OURSELVES EXCLUDED AND ISOLATED, WE EXPERIENCE ADVERSE PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS." Peter Dagampat Ph.D.

Matt Lieberman Retweeted Diego A. Reinero
Nice to be included!
YOU'RE WELCOME, MATEO!

"social isolation was a significant predictor of the risk of death...even when controlling for age, sex, and physical and mental health: being socially isolated increases by about 25 percent the risk that you will die in the next decade" amzn.to/3Ftjpmk
"social isolation was a predictor of mortality on par with smoking, obesity, elevated blood pressure, and high cholesterol" ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P

More recently, researchers have been turning their focus to the related—yet less well studied—phenomenon of "social isolation," a common correlate of loneliness that is nevertheless a separate and distinct state. Loneliness is generally defined as ”the discrepancy between a person's preferred and actual level of social contact.” It is a subjective, qualitative self-perception.

Social isolation, on the other hand, has been defined as “an objective state of having minimal social contact with other individuals.” Social isolation is often assessed using quantitative measures such as marital status, living alone, religious attendance, group memberships, and frequency of contact with children, family, and friends. 

...

The results with regard to loneliness and social isolation, however, have been trending in the opposite direction. For example, Andrew Steptoe and colleagues (2013) assessed both social isolation (in terms of contact with family and friends and participation in civic organizations) and loneliness (via a standard questionnaire measure) in 6,500 men and women aged 52 and older from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, while monitoring all-cause mortality for several years.

They found that mortality was higher both among more isolated and more lonely participants. However, “after adjusting statistically for demographic factors and baseline health, social isolation remained significantly associated with mortality… but loneliness did not.” They conclude: “Both social isolation and loneliness were associated with increased mortality. However, the effect of loneliness was not independent of demographic characteristics or health problems and did not contribute to the risk associated with social isolation. Although both isolation and loneliness impair quality of life and well-being, efforts to reduce isolation are likely to be more relevant to mortality.”

Berkeley researcher Bin Yu and colleagues (2020) followed 1267 Taiwanese patients 65 years or older with confirmed CVD for up to 10 years. Analyzing the association between social isolation and loneliness at baseline and mortality at follow-up while adjusting for demographic variables, health-related behaviors, and health status. “Social isolation was associated with increased risk of mortality after accounting for established risk factors… whereas loneliness was not associated with increased risk of mortality.”

A recent (2022) study by researcher Chun Shen and colleagues used neuroimaging data from over 400,000 participants in the UK Biobank large longitudinal data set to explore whether social isolation and loneliness predicted dementia. Socially isolated individuals were shown to have a 26% increased likelihood of developing dementia, after adjusting for various risk factors including socio-economic factors, chronic illness, lifestyle, depression, APOE genotype (a genetic risk factor for dementia), Alzheimer's disease, and cardiovascular disease.

Socially isolated individuals were found to have lower gray matter volumes in brain regions involved in memory and learning. Interestingly, while loneliness was also initially associated with subsequent dementia, the association disappeared after adjusting for depression. In other words, the effects of loneliness may be attributed mostly to depression. The authors note: “Relative to the subjective feeling of loneliness, objective social isolation is an independent risk factor for later dementia.”

...

Humans are social animals. We need to be connected to other humans through friendships, companionships, and romantic relationships. A series of reviews have examined the relationship between loneliness and physical and mental health (Christiansen, et al., 2021; Hodgson, et al., 2020). Here’s what they’ve found:

There is little doubt that loneliness and lack of social connections can lead to depression and anxiety, but there is also good evidence that lonely people have poorer physical health. For example, people who have no friendships or poor-quality support relationships are more prone to premature death. Some of this may be due to stress, as those without social connections lack the support from friends and loved ones that help them to cope with stress-related illnesses. There is also some evidence that people who lack these supportive relationships are more prone to life-threatening heart attack and stroke – one reason why the American Heart Association has warned the public against the dangers of social isolation.

In fact, studies (e.g., Algoe, 2019) have found that when it comes to strategies that increase human lifespan, good interpersonal relationships are important, along with well-known healthful practices such as regular exercise, a healthy diet, avoidance of addictive substances, and good sleep patterns.

At a more “informal” level, our own research showed that first-year college students who established good social relationships with peers were less likely to drop out of college, and reported higher levels of satisfaction and engagement. In fact, it wasn’t enough for students to just focus on academic pursuits; they also needed to feel social connections to do well (Riggio et al., 1993).


https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/biohack-your-brain/202102/how-social-isolation-and-loneliness-impact-brain-function

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-fifth-vital-sign/202005/the-impact-social-isolation-and-loneliness
https://www.psypost.org/social-isolation-leads-to-reductions-in-brain-cells-and-mild-cognitive-impairment/

In 2009, peace activist Sarah Shourd and her two companions were hiking in the mountains of Northern Iraq - an area that was, at that time, peaceful. They followed recommendations from locals to see the Ahmed Awa waterfall. Unfortunately, this waterfall was located at the Iraqi border with Iran. They were arrested by Iranian border guards on suspicion of being American spies. The two men were put in the same cell, but Sarah was separated from them in solitary confinement. With the exception of two thirty-minute periods each day, she spent the next 410 days in an isolated cell.
In Sarah's words:
In the early weeks and months of solitary confinement you're reduced to an animal-like state. I mean, you are an animal in a cage, and the majority of your hours are spent pacing. And the animal-like state eventually transforms into a more plant-like state: your mind starts to slow down and your thoughts become repetitive. Your brain turns on itself and becomes the source of your worst pain and your worst torture. I'd relive every moment of my life, and eventually you run out of memories. You've told them all to yourself so many times. And it doesn't take that long.
https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1084904395211386880
Sarah's social deprivation caused deep psychological pain: without interaction, a brain suffers. Solitary confinement is illegal in many jurisdictions, precisely because observers have long recognized the damage caused by stripping away one of the most vital aspects of a human life: interaction with others. Starved of contact with the world, Sarah rapidly entered a hallucinatory state.
 The sun would come in at a certain time of day at an angle through my window. And all of the little dust particles in my cell were illuminated by the sun. I saw all those particles of dust as other human beings occupying the planet. And they were in the stream of life, they were interacting, they were bouncing off one another. They were doing something collective. I saw myself as off in a corner, walled up. Out of the stream of life.
In September 2010, after more than a year in captivity, Sarah was released and allowed to rejoin the world. The trauma of the event stayed with her: she suffered from depression and was easily led to panic. The next year she married Shane Bauer, one of the other hikers. She reports that she and Shane are able to calm one another, but it's not always easy: they both carry emotional scars.

The philosopher Martin Heidegger suggested that it is difficult to speak of a person "being", instead we are typically "being in the world." This was his way of emphasizing that the world around you is a large part of who you are. The self doesn't exist in a vacuum.

Although scientists and clinicians can observe what happens to people in solitary confinement, it is difficult to study directly. However, an experiment by neuroscientist Naomi Eisenberger can give insight into what happens in the brain in a slightly tamer condition: when we are excluded from a  group.
One Is The Loneliest Number!

Imagine throwing a ball around with a couple of other people, and at some point you get cut out of the game: the other two throw back and forth between themselves, excluding you. Eisenberger's experiment is based on that simple scenario. She had volunteers play a simple computer game in which their animated character threw a ball around with two other players. The volunteers were led to believe that the other players were controlled by two other humans, but in fact they were just part of a computer program. At first, the others played nicely - but after a while, they cut the volunteer out of the game, and simply threw between each other.

Eisenberger had the volunteers play this game while they were lying down in a brain scanner (the technique is called functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI). She found something remarkable: when the volunteers were left out of the game, areas involved in their pain matrix became active. Not getting the ball might seem insignificant, but to the brain social rejection is so meaningful that it hurts, literally.


Why does rejection hurt? Presumably, this is a clue that social bonding has evolutionary importance - in other words, the pain is a mechanism that steers us toward interaction and acceptance by others. Our inbuilt neural machinery drives us toward bonding with others. It urges us to form groups.

This sheds light on the social world that surrounds us: everywhere, humans constantly form groups. We bind together through links of family, friendship, work, style, sports teams, religion, culture, skin pigment, language, hobbies, and political affiliation. It gives us comfort to belong to a group - and that fact gives us a critical hint about our species' history.    

The Brain: The Story of You. Eagleman, p. 144-147

Relationships are key to our happiness and well being At any age, there is a 14% higher risk of dying early associated with loneliness and a 32% higher risk of dying early associated with social isolation. Building healthy relationships is one of the best things you can do for yourself. nytimes.com/2024/07/11/opi
"clearest message … from this 75-year study … Good relationships keep us happier & healthier.… Strong, long-term relationships with spouses, family & friends built on deep trust — not achievement, not fortune or fame — were what predicted well-being."
 NO LOVE
"social relationships are associated with reduced mortality...Participants who maintained adequate social relationships demonstrated a 50% greater likelihood of survival in contrast to participants without adequate relationships." guilford.com/books/Handbook
I'm Gonna Die Prematurely Because NO ONE Likes ME And I Have NO ONE As A Friend!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/opinion/sunday/popular-people-live-longer.html
The results revealed that being unpopular — feeling isolated, disconnected, lonely — predicts our life span. More surprising is just how powerful this effect can be. Dr. Holt-Lunstad found that people who had larger networks of friends had a 50 percent increased chance of survival by the end of the study they were in. And those who had good-quality relationships had a 91 percent higher survival rate. This suggests that being unpopular increases our chance of death more strongly than obesity, physical inactivity or binge drinking. In fact, the only comparable health hazard is smoking.
...
This may be why we remain so attuned to popularity today, even when we’re not consciously thinking of it. Research in psychology and neuroscience has begun to reveal a number of automatic physiological responses to unpopularity. For instance, our popularity may have an effect on our DNA.

https://x.com/robsica/status/1909653676571926913
"we need to understand social isolation not as some endogenous risk factor, but as itself socially, economically and politically determined, and thus a contributor to social inequalities in health"
Why do loneliness and poverty go together? – Daniel Nettle

https://www.amazon.com/Loneliness-Psychosocial-Prevalence-Psychology-Motivations/dp/163482640X/

George Slavich and Steve Cole, experts in the field of human social genomics at the University of California, Los Angeles, have described our genomic material as being exquisitely “sensitive to social rejection.” They study what happens immediately after we’ve been left by a romantic partner, excluded from a social event, rejected by a stranger or even simply told that we may be judged by others we care about. Within 40 minutes, they and other researchers have found, these experiences affect the expression of individual genes, determining which parts of our DNA are turned on or off (called epigenetics). Even imagining that we might lose our connection to the herd, they have found, can change how DNA behaves.


How Loneliness Undermines Health

The structure of modern societies exposes large numbers of people to circumstances where it is difficult to fulfill social needs and avoid loneliness. With increased loneliness comes vulnerability to anxiety and depression that are associated with leading killers such as heart disease, drug addiction, and suicide.

While the psychological effects of social isolation are fairly obvious, health researchers have labored to establish the mechanisms through which loneliness increases the risk of early mortality. Loneliness increases stress hormones. This is partly because close social interaction releases oxytocin, an anti-stress hormone. Loneliness also increases inflammation that features in diverse serious illnesses, including heart disease and cancers.

Lonely people often suffer from a lack of meaning that derives from social integration and community involvement. They are prone to hopelessness and are not good at recovering from setbacks.

Loneliness is associated with poor nutrition, bad sleep habits, smoking, and failure to get adequate exercise or medical attention. It is alarming that around half of Americans report feeling lonely. This is a grim statistic, considering that loneliness increases the risk of premature mortality by 65 percent.

https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1628766477330403332
"By far the biggest medical surprise of the past decade has been the extraordinary number of studies showing that the single best predictor of health and wellbeing is simply the number and quality of close friendships you have." penguin.co.uk/books/444270/t
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/12/well/live/having-friends-is-good-for-you.html
In fact, the researchers found that “those with close social ties and unhealthful lifestyles (such as smokingobesity and lack of exerciseactually lived longer than those with poor social ties but more healthful living habits,” Mr. Robbins wrote. However, he quickly added, “Needless to say, people with both healthful lifestyles and close social ties lived the longest of all.”

You're Only Lonely If You Feel Lonely. So You Can Be A Loner, But If You Feel As Though Your Social Life Is Satisfactory You Won't Feel Lonely! It's All In The Mind Folks! You're Only Lonely If You Allow Yourself To Feel Lonely!

Very interesting read about links between loneliness and mental health problems
 PSYCHOLOGICAL PAIN IS SIMILAR TO PHYSICAL PAIN BECAUSE BOTH TYPES OF PAIN ARE A RESULT OF THE SAME NEUROLOGICAL PATHWAYS (ARE THE RESULT OF THE SAME BRAIN WIRING). CONSEQUENTLY, BOTH SOURCES OF PAIN CAN BE RELIVED IN THE SAME WAY (EITHER BY TAKING PAIN MEDICATION OR ILLICIT DRUGS (OPIUM) OR DRINKING ALCOHOL; I PREFER ALCOHOL!)!

Opiate of the masses: Social connection, the pleasurable, subjective experience of feeling close to other people, is mediated by opioids.

I'm Going To Church, Joe!
Just as the lonely invent imaginary companions to replace real human bonds, so too many atheists invent imaginary religions to replace real faith. The religious instinct cannot be eradicated, only perverted.
Happy pill not invent yet, so just treat mental health actual serious for now.
https://www.amazon.com/Cry-Unheard-Insights-Consequences-Loneliness/dp/1890862118
Social loneliness produces a subjective craving not unlike the food craving we experience after many hours of not eating. It may also activate brain areas related to craving.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqrcanPgGyI
Going Ape Social Climbers S01E03 Full Episode Tune
36:45-40:30 (39:55 There I Go AgainThat's ME Crawling On All 4s!)

The fewer social relations as person has, the shorter the life expectancy, and the worse the impact of various infectious diseases. Medically, protective relationships can take the form of marriage, contact with friends and extended family. church membership, or other group affiliations. Moreover, the process of becoming isolated from your significant other - going through a divorce or having severe marital problems - is also associated with worse immune functioning. To continue these themes, people who score high on loneliness scales have been found to have relatively depressed immune function. Moreover, social stressors tend to be more immunosuppressive than noninterpersonal stressors.
This is a fairly consistent pattern that cuts across a lot of different settings. Moreover, these general findings are based on some careful prospective studies and are seen in both sexes and in different races, in American and European populations living in urban and rural areas. Most importantly, this effect is big. The impact of social relationships on life expectancy appears to be at least as large as that of variables such as cigarette smoking, hypertension, obesity, and level of physical activity. People with the fewest social connections have approximately two-and-a-half times as much chance of dying as those with the most connections, after controlling for such variables as age, gender, and health status.

This is very exciting, and we can readily apply steps 1 through 4 to these studies  - socially isolated people are more stressed, for lack of social outlets and support (step 1); this leads to chronic activation of stress responses (step 2), leading to immune suppression (step 3) and more infectious diseases (step 4). Nice, but there are lots of other ways to get from social isolation to poor health. What if the problem is that socially isolated people lack that someone special to remind them to take their daily medication. It is known that isolated people are less likely to comply with a medical regime. What if they're more likely to subsist on reheated fast food instead of something nutritious? Or more likely to indulge in some foolish risk-taking behavior, like smoking, because there's no one to try to convince them to stop? There are many lifestyle patterns that could link social isolation with step 4 and bypass 1 through 3 entirely. Or what if the causality is reversed - what if the linkage occurs because sickly people are less likely to be able to maintain stable social relationships?

Despite these counterinterpretations, it looks as if the linkage between social isolation and poor health is at least partially mediated through the psychoneuroimmune cascade of steps 1 through 4 that we've outlined. For one thing, the careful studies have controlled for variables such as smoking, diet, or medication compliance. Even stronger support comes from primate studies: social isolation impairs the immunity and health of monkeys, and animals put into stressful environments that would normally suppress their immune system are buffered from that happening if they are in the company of friends. Just as in humans - but without the human confounds of medication, Big Macs, alcohol, and smoking.

An extreme version of social isolation is, of course, the loss of a loved one, and a common scenario in literature is of the one left behind - the grieving spouse, the bereft parent, even the masterless pet - now pining away to an early death. A number of studies suggest that bereavement does indeed increase the risk of dying. This does not appear to be the case among all grieving individuals, however. Instead, it appears that the person has to have an additional physiological or psychological risk factor coupled with the bereavement. In one carefully controlled prospective study, the parents of all the Israeli men who died in the Lebanese war were followed for ten years afterward. Loss of a son did  not affect mortality rate in the population of grieving parents in general; however, significantly higher mortality rates occurred among parents who were already widowed or divorced. In other words, this stressor is associated with increased mortality in the subset of parents with the added risk factor of minimal social support.

Sometimes the additional risk factor can be immunological. This is seen among HIV-positive people. When comparing individuals matched for severity of the disease, those who are in the process of grieving for a lost loved one show a more dramatic decline in immune function in the aftermath than those not grieving.

Insofar as there is a link between bereavement and increased mortality, we once again have to consider whether this is due to steps 1 through 4. Once again, the psychoneuroimmune sequence: an elderly man loses his wife and has an increased risk of dying in the next year. An obvious interpretation would be that the stressor of bereavement (step 1) activates his stress-response (step 2), causing enough immunosuppression (step 3) to make him sick (step 4). However, there are the obvious alternative routes - he doesn't bother to eat healthfully, takes to drinking, doesn't take his medication. Perhaps he drives more recklessly than he would have otherwise. Sometimes the confound is more subtle. People tend to marry people who are ethnically and genetically quite similar to themselves. Intrinsic in this trend toward "homogamy" is a tendency of married couples to have higher-than-random chances of sharing certain genetic disease tendencies, which make it more likely that they will get sick around the same time. Thus, a variety of alternative routes might explain the bereavement literature, though it still remains unclear how much these plausible confounds come into play.

...

Social support is certainly protective for humans as well. This can be demonstrated even in transient instances of support. In a number of subtle studies, subjects were exposed to a stressor - having to give a public speech or perform a mental arithmetic task, or having two strangers argue with them - with or without a supportive friend present. In each case, social support translated into less of a cardiovascular stress-response. Profound and persistent differences in degrees of social support can influence human physiology as well: within the same family, there are significantly higher glucocorticoid levels among stepchildren than among biological children.

As noted in the chapter on immunity, people with spouses or close friends have longer life expediencies. When the spouse dies, the risk of dying skyrockets. Recall also from that chapter the study of parents of Israeli soldiers killed in the Lebanon war: in the aftermath of this stressor, there was no noticeable increase in risk of disease or mortality - except among those who were already divorced or widowed. Some additional examples concern the cardiovascular system. People who are socially isolated have overly active sympathetic nervous systems. Given the likelihood that this will lead to higher blood pressure and more platelet aggregation in their blood vessels...they are more likely to have heart disease - two to five times as likely, as it turns out. And once they have the heart disease, they are more likely to die at a younger age. In a study of patients with severe coronary heart disease, Redford Williams of Duke University and colleagues found that half of those lacking social support were dead within five years - a rate three times higher than was seen in patients who had a spouse or close friend, after controlling for the severity of the disease. 

Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers. Sapolsky, p. 142-145, 165.

Solitaire!
https://twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/1290316503582035970
I Have No Friends! 
https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1305871956751929344
Foe Realz!

Who we spend time with at different ages (US) • Adolescence: parents, siblings, and friends • Early- to mid-adulthood: co-workers, partners, and children • Later years: partners, plus more and more time alone bit.ly/2IF5Hnx HT

https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1861719077359641010
As Americans age, they spend increasingly large amounts of time completely alone.

https://x.com/robkhenderson/status/1725927751096430688
“decline in family formation has introduced a number of social pathologies, including an epidemic of loneliness. It also contributes to the mortality rate, insofar as nonparents on average have shorter lifespans and a higher rate of suicide than parents”
https://www.psypost.org/loneliness-follows-a-u-shaped-path-across-adulthood-study-finds/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/202001/who-experiences-more-loneliness-men-or-women
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/202406/will-you-become-lonely-as-you-age

"Studies of people's life regrets find that most regrets involve social relationships and lack of social connectedness, supporting the fundamental 'need to belong' as part of our evolved nature." amzn.to/3spMLxj
https://x.com/DegenRolf/status/1550072282135003143
Boys and men are more socially isolated than girls and women, and both sexes experience increasing social isolation across the life course. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117

Boys and men experience more social isolation than girls and women, study finds

https://x.com/datepsych/status/1848223017077477708
Sex differences in friendship. 1. Women tend to have more friends than men. The size of friend groups declines with age, faster for men, but ends up similar later in life. 2. Women who are more agreeable have more friends, while men who are more impulsive, more promiscuous, and who have higher relationship satisfaction have fewer friends. 3. Men tend to have higher homophily in friend groups - male friends are more similar to one another than female friends are to each other. Promiscuity predicted homophily for men as well - so less promiscuous men probably have male friends who are less promiscuous.
https://x.com/PsychoSchmitt/status/1848355533876580503
http://methalashun.blogspot.com/2014/05/dont-cry-for-me-argentina-aint-nobody.html

You Can't Hold The Beliefs I Hold Concerning Race And Religion (That There Are Racial Differences Resulting In Different Behavior And Different Life Outcomes And That God Has No Part To Play In Any Of This Because God Doesn't Exist), Announce Them To The World,  And Expect To Be Liked And Accepted By People. Why? because These
 Beliefs Are Anathema To Most People (Unacceptable) Since They're Contrary To The Myths, Legends, And Folklore (i.e.Wive's Tales, Common Sense, And Intuition) That They've Been Inculcated By Our Culture To Believe And Are Ultimately Unpleasing To The Mind (i.e. These Beliefs Don't Provide The Upbeat, Positive, Optimistic, Encouraging Thoughts That We've Evolved To Seek In Beliefs And Ideologies).

http://www.wsj.com/articles/to-beat-the-blues-visits-must-be-real-not-virtual-1464899707

https://x.com/datepsych/status/1914761170478829992
It’s funny when isolated loners think they would thrive in some kind of apocalyptic collapse scenario. You have no war band. No friends. No networks. No people who would supply you with anything. You haven’t been militiamaxxing. No one is going to give you food or ammunition. You can’t even go out and steal it because every neighborhood is blockaded by tight-knit boomers with guns. The urban environments are controlled by gangs of 100+ strong street youths who already had their own war bands: gangs. You’re young and spent more time playing video games than developing any usefully skills, so you know no survival crafts and you can’t build anything. You would just be prey.
PRAY